Abstract
The sugarbeet cyst nematode (SBCN) is a serious pest of sugarbeet. Use of a nematode-resistant, trap-crop oil radish as a second crop foUowing harvest of dry bean and com was studied for its potential to reduce soil populations of SBCN and, therefore, reduce nematicide use. Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) was groWn on four SBCN-iofested fields, two foUowing corn harvested as silage and two foUowing dry bean barvest, in comparison to an unseeded control treatment (main plots). Subplots consisting of aldicarb at thr~ rates were randomized witbin main plots at sugarbeet planting tbe following year. The design was a randomized complete block with six replicates. Moisture was not adequate for radish growth at one site. At the other sites, radish growth varied from 416 to, 1453 kg ha1 • Soil population of SBCN declined 57% (P O.05) at three other sites. Including SBCN-resistant radish in the dry bean-sugarbeet and coro-sugarbeet rotations increased (P o.05). At the other site where silage com was grown, aldicarb but not radish, increased sugarbeet yield (P O.OS). No disease or insect pest was detected on radish, nor was any disease or insect pest of sugarbeet increased by growing S8CN-resistant radish as a second crop. This study showed that the potential of substituting SBCN-resistaot oil radish for nematicide following dry bean and corn in southeast Wyoming is limited. Substituting a small grain for corn or dry bean would allow more growing degree days (GDDs) for radish growth and SBCN activity. Additional Key Words: Biological control, trap crop, nematicide, aldicarb, sUgarbeet cyst nematode, Bela vulgaris, sugarbeet tPublished with the approval of the Associate Director, Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station as lournal Article No. IA-I778. The au1hors are Professors of Agronomy, Plant Pathology and Agronomy, respectively, University ofWyoming.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Oil radish growth at the other sites varied from 416 to 1453 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativuse2 - Outcome
- radish growthe4
- Value
- 416 to, 1453 kg ha1e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) was groWn on four SBCN-iofested fields, two foUowing corn harvested as silage and two foUowing dry bean barvest, in comparison to an unseeded control treatment (main plots)”
e4“At the other sites, radish growth varied from 416 to, 1453 kg ha1”
Claim · model-written summary
Moisture was not adequate for radish growth at one site.
- Taxon
- radish
Raphanus sativuse5 - Outcome
- Moisture was not adequate for radish growthe5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) was groWn on four SBCN-iofested fields, two foUowing corn harvested as silage and two foUowing dry bean barvest, in comparison to an unseeded control treatment (main plots)”
e5“Moisture was not adequate for radish growth at one site.”
Claim · model-written summary
Trap-cropping with nematode-resistant oil radish reduced sugarbeet cyst nematode soil populations by 57% at three other sites.
- Taxon
- Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativuse2 - Treatment
- trap-crop oil radishe3
- Interactor
- SBCNe6pest
- Outcome
- Soil population of SBCNe6
- Direction
- declinede6
- Value
- 57%e6
- Qualifier
- at three other sitese6
- Comparator
- unseeded control treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) was groWn on four SBCN-iofested fields, two foUowing corn harvested as silage and two foUowing dry bean barvest, in comparison to an unseeded control treatment (main plots)”
e3“Use of a nematode-resistant, trap-crop oil radish as a second crop foUowing harvest of dry bean and com was studied for its potential to reduce soil populations of SBCN and, therefore, reduce nematicide use”
e6“Soil population of SBCN declined 57% (P O.05) at three other sites”
Claim · model-written summary
Including nematode-resistant radish in the dry bean-sugarbeet and corn-sugarbeet rotations increased an outcome that is unreadable in the OCR text.
- Taxon
- sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise7 - Treatment
- SBCN-resistant radishe7
- Direction
- increasede7
Not reportedComparatorOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e7“Including SBCN-resistant radish in the dry bean-sugarbeet and coro-sugarbeet rotations increased (P o.05)”
Claim · model-written summary
Aldicarb increased sugarbeet yield at the site where silage corn was grown.
- Taxon
- sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- aldicarbe0
- Outcome
- sugarbeet yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“At the other site where silage com was grown, aldicarb but not radish, increased sugarbeet yield (P O.OS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Radish did not increase sugarbeet yield at the site where silage corn was grown.
- Taxon
- sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- radishe0
- Outcome
- sugarbeet yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“At the other site where silage com was grown, aldicarb but not radish, increased sugarbeet yield (P O.OS)”
Claim · model-written summary
No disease or insect pest was detected on radish grown as a second crop.
- Taxon
- radish
Raphanus sativuse0 - Outcome
- No disease or insect pest was detectede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“No disease or insect pest was detected on radish, nor was any disease or insect pest of sugarbeet increased by growing S8CN-resistant radish as a second crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Growing S8CN-resistant radish as a second crop did not increase disease or insect pests of sugarbeet.
- Taxon
- sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- S8CN-resistant radishe0
- Outcome
- disease or insect pest of sugarbeete0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“No disease or insect pest was detected on radish, nor was any disease or insect pest of sugarbeet increased by growing S8CN-resistant radish as a second crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that substituting SBCN-resistant oil radish for nematicide following dry bean and corn in southeast Wyoming is limited.
Verbatim
e0“This study showed that the potential of substituting SBCN-resistaot oil radish for nematicide following dry bean and corn in southeast Wyoming is limited”
Claim · model-written summary
Substituting a small grain for corn or dry bean is expected to allow more growing degree days for radish growth and SBCN activity.
- Taxon
- radish
Raphanus sativuse0 - Outcome
- more growing degree dayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Substituting a small grain for corn or dry bean would allow more growing degree days (GDDs) for radish growth and SBCN activity”
The same questions in other papers
aldicarb · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →trap barrier · pest · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.