Paper · 2012 · JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH

Determining critical weed competition period in maize (Zea mays L.) sown under different tillage intensities.

Sajid Hussain; Muhammad Nadeem; Asif Tanveer; et al.

5
claims
19
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad to determine the critical weed competition period in maize (Zea mays L.) sown under different tillage intensities. The field trial was laid out with split plot design having three replicates with a net plot size of 4.5 m x 6 m. The experiment comprised of three tillage practices namely deep cultivation with disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivator, rotavator + 3 cultivations with cultivator, and only 3 cultivations with cultivator; and five weed competition periods of 20, 30, 40 days after crop emergence along with weed free and weedy check. The linear increase in the density of weeds (m -2 ) with the competition periods would be due to more time period available for weed seed germination which ultimately resulted in the reduction of total grain yield. Plant population at harvest, number of grains cob -1 , number of grain rows cob -1 , total number of grains cob -1 , 1000-grain weight (g), grain yield, dried stalk yield and biological yield were maximum in disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivator.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density in maize increased linearly with the length of the weed competition period.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
competition periodse2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
density of weeds (m -2 )e2
Direction
increasee2
Setting
Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“critical weed competition period in maize (Zea mays L.) sown under different tillage intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–240 · show in text ↑
e2

“The linear increase in the density of weeds (m -2 ) with the competition periods would be due to more time period available for weed seed germination which ultimately resulted in the reduction of total grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition periods reduced total grain yield of maize relative to weed-free treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
weed competition periodse3
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
total grain yielde2
Direction
reductione2
Comparator
weed freee3
Setting
Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“critical weed competition period in maize (Zea mays L.) sown under different tillage intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–240 · show in text ↑
e2

“The linear increase in the density of weeds (m -2 ) with the competition periods would be due to more time period available for weed seed germination which ultimately resulted in the reduction of total grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–892 · show in text ↑
e3

“five weed competition periods of 20, 30, 40 days after crop emergence along with weed free and weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disc plough plus three cultivations gave maximum plant population at harvest, grains per cob and grain rows per cob in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
deep cultivation with disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivatore4
Outcome
Plant population at harvest, number of grains cob -1 , number of grain rows cob -1e5
Direction
maximume5
Comparator
rotavator + 3 cultivations with cultivatore4
Setting
Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“critical weed competition period in maize (Zea mays L.) sown under different tillage intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–240 · show in text ↑
e4

“three tillage practices namely deep cultivation with disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivator, rotavator + 3 cultivations with cultivator, and only 3 cultivations with cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–565 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plant population at harvest, number of grains cob -1 , number of grain rows cob -1 , total number of grains cob -1 , 1000-grain weight (g), grain yield, dried stalk yield and biological yield were maximum in disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disc plough plus three cultivations gave maximum total grains per cob, 1000-grain weight and grain yield in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
deep cultivation with disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivatore4
Outcome
total number of grains cob -1 , 1000-grain weight (g), grain yielde5
Direction
maximume5
Comparator
rotavator + 3 cultivations with cultivatore4
Setting
Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“critical weed competition period in maize (Zea mays L.) sown under different tillage intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–240 · show in text ↑
e4

“three tillage practices namely deep cultivation with disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivator, rotavator + 3 cultivations with cultivator, and only 3 cultivations with cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–565 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plant population at harvest, number of grains cob -1 , number of grain rows cob -1 , total number of grains cob -1 , 1000-grain weight (g), grain yield, dried stalk yield and biological yield were maximum in disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disc plough plus three cultivations gave maximum dried stalk yield and biological yield in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
deep cultivation with disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivatore4
Outcome
dried stalk yield and biological yielde5
Direction
maximume5
Comparator
rotavator + 3 cultivations with cultivatore4
Setting
Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“critical weed competition period in maize (Zea mays L.) sown under different tillage intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–240 · show in text ↑
e4

“three tillage practices namely deep cultivation with disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivator, rotavator + 3 cultivations with cultivator, and only 3 cultivations with cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–565 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plant population at harvest, number of grains cob -1 , number of grain rows cob -1 , total number of grains cob -1 , 1000-grain weight (g), grain yield, dried stalk yield and biological yield were maximum in disc plough + 3 cultivations with cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1146 · show in text ↑

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

competition · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

38 papers: 7 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.