Paper · 2010 · Lucrări Ştiinţifice, Universitatea de Stiinte Agricole Şi Medicină Veterinară "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" Iaşi, Seria Agronomie

The influence of conservation tillage systems on productivity elements in the maize crop on the Moldavian Plain.

Denis Țopa; G. Chiriac; M. Cara; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was carried out between 2005 – 2008 at Ezareni – The Experimental Farm of the Agricultural University of Iasi, in the East side of Romania (4707’ N latitude, 2730’E longitude), on a cambic chernozem (SRTS2003), or haplic chernozems (WRB-SR, 1998), with a clay-loamy texture, 6.8 pH, 2.7% humus content and a medium level of fertilization. The experimental area has an annual average temperature of 9.4C and precipitation of 587 mm. The experiment was a “split plot” design with three replicates. Plots covered an area of 60 m with a rotation of soybean winter wheat maize. The maize mean yield values showed significant differences in plots plowed at 20 cm and very significant results in the disc harrow treatment when compared to the control treatment. These findings confirm that increasing tillage depth result in higher yields. In disc harrow plots, the mean yield over three years was 4532 kg/ha while the conventional tillage variant (plowed at 20 cm) yield recorded 5528 kg/ha. The highest yield of 6482 kg/ha was recorded in the control treatment (plowed at 30 cm). The conservation variants, chisel and paraplow, resulted in intermediate yields between disc harrow and the control treatment, the differences being statistically nonsignificant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disc harrowing yielded 4532 kg/ha over three years, below the 30 cm plowed control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
disc harrowe0
Outcome
mean yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
4532 kg/hae0
Comparator
plowed at 30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In disc harrow plots, the mean yield over three years was 4532 kg/ha while the conventional tillage variant (plowed at 20 cm) yield recorded 5528 kg/ha. The highest yield of 6482 kg/ha was recorded in the control treatment (plowed at 30 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing tillage depth result in higher yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing at 20 cm yielded 5528 kg/ha, below the 30 cm plowed control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plowed at 20 cme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5528 kg/hae0
Comparator
plowed at 30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the conventional tillage variant (plowed at 20 cm) yield recorded 5528 kg/ha. The highest yield of 6482 kg/ha was recorded in the control treatment (plowed at 30 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel tillage produced intermediate maize yields, with a nonsignificant difference from the 30 cm plowed control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chisele0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
intermediatee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conservation variants, chisel and paraplow, resulted in intermediate yields between disc harrow and the control treatment, the differences being statistically nonsignificant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraplow produced intermediate maize yields, with a nonsignificant difference from the 30 cm plowed control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
paraplowe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
intermediatee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conservation variants, chisel and paraplow, resulted in intermediate yields between disc harrow and the control treatment, the differences being statistically nonsignificant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.