Paper · 2003 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Durum Wheat Response to Nitrogen Fertilization at Safford Agricultural Center, 2003

Lee J. Clark; Keller F. Ellsworth

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was initiated in response to a push by one of the grain buying companies to produce more durum wheat for export from Arizona. The export market required a minimum of 13 % protein and other quality constraints. A nitrogen timing regime was established by the University to provide the crop with this nutrient according to its physiological development. This study had four nitrogen application treatments addressing different ways to provide the crop with its nitrogen needs. No significant differences were seen in yields but slight differences in percent protein were observed. An economic analysis is included to show the profitability of nitrogen applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ significantly among nitrogen application treatments.

Treatment
nitrogen application treatmentse1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
No significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were seen in yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study had four nitrogen application treatments addressing different ways to provide the crop with its nitrogen needs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent protein differed slightly among nitrogen application treatments.

Treatment
nitrogen application treatmentse1
Outcome
percent proteine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slight differences in percent protein were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study had four nitrogen application treatments addressing different ways to provide the crop with its nitrogen needs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–485 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Nitrogen starvation negatively affected spike and seed traits.

    Transcriptomic response of durum wheat to nitrogen starvation · 2017

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.