Paper · 1988 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The response of field beans (Vicia faba L.) to irrigation and sowing date:1. Yield and yield components

M. M. Husain; G. D. Hill; J. N. Gallagher

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

summary The response of 4 crops of autumn- and spring-sown field beans cv. Maris Bead to irrigation applied during the vegetative, flowering and pod-filling phases was examined during 1981–2 and 1982–3. The crops, grown on a Templeton silt-loam, were irrigated weekly in amounts equal to the difference between the estimated evapotranspiration and rainfall of the previous week using trickle irrigation. Seed yield of fully irrigated autumn- and spring-sown crops (averaged over the two seasons), was 5·2 and 3·3 t/ha respectively, about 45% greater than the yield of unirrigated crops. The increase in yield due to irrigation was mainly associated with an increase in total dry matter (TDM) production as harvest index varied little within each sowing. The yield response to each mm of applied irrigation water ranged from 0 to 9 kg/ha and did not appear to be related in any way to the developmental phase of the crop when irrigation was applied. Seed yield within each sowing was closely correlated with the number of beans per unit area and the number of pods per plant. Autumn sowings yielded about 55% more than spring sowings mainly due to a higher harvest index which was associated with a much heavier mean weight per bean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fully irrigated autumn-sown beans yielded 5·2 t/ha, about 45% above unirrigated crops.

Taxon
field beanst0
Material
autumn- and spring-sown cropse0
Treatment
fully irrigatede0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
5·2e0
Comparator
unirrigated cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield of fully irrigated autumn- and spring-sown crops (averaged over the two seasons), was 5·2 and 3·3 t/ha respectively, about 45% greater than the yield of unirrigated crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fully irrigated spring-sown beans yielded 3·3 t/ha, about 45% above unirrigated crops.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
fully irrigatede0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
3·3 t/hae0
Comparator
unirrigated cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield of fully irrigated autumn- and spring-sown crops (averaged over the two seasons), was 5·2 and 3·3 t/ha respectively, about 45% greater than the yield of unirrigated crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation-associated yield increase was mainly associated with greater total dry matter production.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
total dry matter (TDM) productione0
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yield due to irrigation was mainly associated with an increase in total dry matter (TDM) production as harvest index varied little within each sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index varied little within each sowing under irrigation.

Taxon
field beanst0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
varied littlee0

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index varied little within each sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield response to irrigation ranged from 0 to 9 kg/ha per millimeter.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
applied irrigation watere0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Value
0 to 9 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response to each mm of applied irrigation water ranged from 0 to 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield response to irrigation did not appear related to crop developmental phase at application.

Taxon
field beanst0
Organ / stage
developmental phasee0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
yield responsee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response to each mm of applied irrigation water ranged from 0 to 9 kg/ha and did not appear to be related in any way to the developmental phase of the crop when irrigation was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield correlated closely with beans per unit area.

Taxon
field beanst0
Organ / stage
beans per unit areae0
Outcome
Seed yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield within each sowing was closely correlated with the number of beans per unit area and the number of pods per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield correlated closely with pods per plant.

Taxon
field beanst0
Organ / stage
pods per plante0
Outcome
Seed yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield within each sowing was closely correlated with the number of beans per unit area and the number of pods per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn sowing yielded about 55% more than spring sowing.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
Autumn sowingse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Value
55%e0
Comparator
spring sowingse0

Verbatim

e0

“Autumn sowings yielded about 55% more than spring sowings mainly due to a higher harvest index which was associated with a much heavier mean weight per bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn sowings had a higher harvest index than spring sowings.

Taxon
field beanst0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
spring sowingse0

Verbatim

e0

“Autumn sowings yielded about 55% more than spring sowings mainly due to a higher harvest index which was associated with a much heavier mean weight per bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher harvest index was associated with heavier mean weight per bean.

Taxon
field beanst0
Organ / stage
beane0
Outcome
mean weight per beane0
Direction
heaviere0

Verbatim

e0

“a higher harvest index which was associated with a much heavier mean weight per bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 87 positive, 35 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

118 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.