Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation increased seed yield of spring and autumn sowings but did not completely compensate for the yield reduction caused by spring sowing.

A claim from Response of field beans ( Vicia faba L cv. Maris Bead) to time of sowing, plant population, nitrogen, and irrigation · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased seed yield of spring and autumn sowings but did not completely compensate for the yield reduction caused by spring sowing.

Taxon
field beanse0
Treatment
Irrigatione4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
did not completely compensate for the yield reduction which was caused by spring sowinge4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Verbatim

e0

“Four populations of field beans ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–57
e4

“Irrigation increased seed yield of both spring and autumn sowings but did not completely compensate for the yield reduction which was caused by spring sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–655

Title

Response of field beans ( Vicia faba L cv. Maris Bead) to time of sowing, plant population, nitrogen, and irrigation

S. D. Newton; G. D. Hill New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 1987. doi:10.1080/03015521.1987.10425592

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-73136fbfaefe63eb1ef5b155a3b6faa2e9c2d902fb67183e17275f6607745e25 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 87 positive, 35 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 32 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Fully irrigated autumn-sown beans yielded 5·2 t/ha, about 45% above unirrigated crops.

    The response of field beans (Vicia faba L.) to irrigation and sowing date:1. Yield and yield components · 1988 · compared with unirrigated crops

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Deficit irrigation lowered common bean yield relative to supplementary irrigation.

    Deficit irrigation at different growth stages of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., cv. Imbabello) · 1997 · compared with supplementary irrigation

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Irrigation 25% below full irrigation reduced seed yield by 30% on average.

    Dry Bean [Phaseolus vulgaris L.] Growth and Yield Response to Variable Irrigation in the Arid to Semi-Arid Climate · 2020 · compared with FIT

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit and reduced light exposure shortened pods.

    Water Stress Permanently Alters Shoot Architecture in Common Bean Plants · 2019

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Dry bean yields were not reduced by daily sprinkler irrigation much below estimated ET on loam soil near Prosser.

    Response of Dry Beans to Daily Deficit Sprinkler Irrigation1 · 1983 · compared with estimated evapotranspiration

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Snap beans irrigated when soil water reached 32% of available were small and had a low yield.

    EFFECT OF FIVE SOIL WATER REGIMES ON GROWTH AND COMPOSITION OF SNAP BEANS · 1969

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Grain yield was lower under restricted watering.

    Water Shortage Affects Vegetative and Reproductive Stages of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Chilean Landraces, Differentially Impacting Grain Yield Components · 2022 · compared with OW

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Potassium placement, phosphorus source and row preparation gave similar common bean yields.

    Yield response to fertilization strategies in no-tillage soybean, corn and common bean crops · 2010

    Opposite direction

113 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.