Paper · 1989 · Biological Agriculture & Horticulture

Biological Weed Control in Plantains (Musa AAB) with Egusi Melon (Colocynthis citrullusL.)

J. C. Obiefuna

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The experiment investigated the effect of intercropping plantains with 2,500, 5,000 and 10,000 melons/ha on delayed weeding for 3, 5 and 7 months respectively after planting. The yield of melons decreased with increased population. Intercropping plantains with 5,000 melons/ha suppressed weed growth for 7 months and significantly enhanced plantain establishment growth and yield. At 2,500 melons/ha, weeding could be delayed for only 3 months after planting beyond which weed competition reduced plantain growth and yield. Planting melons at high density checked weed growth for 7 months but reduced plantain establishment, retarded the growth and reduced the yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon yield decreased as melon population increased.

Treatment
increased populatione0
Outcome
yield of melonse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus mucosospermus
Citrullus mucosospermus · TaxonMicha Baum · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egusi Melon (Colocynthis citrullusL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield of melons decreased with increased population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping 5,000 melons/ha suppressed weed growth for 7 months.

Taxon
plantainsMusa ABB Groupe0
Treatment
Intercropping plantains with 5,000 melons/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
7 monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Plantains (Musa AAB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping plantains with 5,000 melons/ha suppressed weed growth for 7 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping 5,000 melons/ha significantly enhanced plantain establishment growth and yield.

Taxon
plantainsMusa ABB Groupe0
Treatment
Intercropping plantains with 5,000 melons/hae0
Outcome
plantain establishment growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping plantains with 5,000 melons/ha suppressed weed growth for 7 months and significantly enhanced plantain establishment growth and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–389 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

At 2,500 melons/ha, weeding could be delayed for only 3 months.

Taxon
melonsCucumis meloe0
Treatment
2,500 melons/hae0
Outcome
weeding could be delayed for only 3 monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 2,500 melons/ha, weeding could be delayed for only 3 months after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–467 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition beyond 3 months at 2,500 melons/ha reduced plantain growth and yield.

Taxon
plantainMusa ABB Groupe0
Treatment
2,500 melons/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
plantain growth and yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“At 2,500 melons/ha, weeding could be delayed for only 3 months after planting beyond which weed competition reduced plantain growth and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density melon planting checked weed growth for 7 months.

Taxon
melonsCucumis meloe0
Treatment
Planting melons at high densitye0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
checkede0
Value
7 monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting melons at high density checked weed growth for 7 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density melon planting reduced plantain establishment, growth and yield.

Taxon
plantainMusa ABB Groupt0
Treatment
Planting melons at high densitye0
Outcome
plantain establishment, retarded the growth and reduced the yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Plantains (Musa AAB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Planting melons at high density checked weed growth for 7 months but reduced plantain establishment, retarded the growth and reduced the yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–676 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Musa x paradisiaca (banana)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.