Paper · 2003 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Response of Plantain Intercropped with Arable Crops to Varying Levels of Potassium Fertilizer on an Alfisol

S. O. S. Akinyemi; H. Tijani‐Eniola; A. O. Olaleye

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract An on‐farm experiment was conducted in 1992 and 1993 on an Alfisol in south western Nigeria. The objectives of this study were: (i) to determine the response of varying levels of potassium (K) fertilizer to plantain when grown as sole or intercropped with selected arable crops such as melon, maize, and cassava and (ii) to determine the critical limit of K in the soil at 90% relative plantain bunch yield. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications. The treatments were four cropping systems: sole plantain (SP), plantain + melon (PME), plantain + maize (PMA), and plantain + cassava (PCA). Five levels of potassium fertilizers were used: 0, 120, 240, 360, and 480 kg K ha−1. The results showed that bunch yield of plantain at harvesting, the cropping systems follows the order: PME > SP > PCA > PMA. Highest bunch yield of about 10.39 t ha−1 were obtained with PME intercropping at the rate of 360 kg K ha−1. At varying levels of K fertilizers significant differences ( p < 0.05) were observed amongst the following morphological parameters: 50% days to shooting, plant height, number of suckers/stool as well as number of fingers/bunch. Cate and Nelson model showed that when these data are pooled, optimum soil test K was between 0.20 and 0.21 cmol kg−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantain bunch yield at harvest followed the order PME > SP > PCA > PMA across the cropping systems.

Taxon
plantainMusa ABB Groupe1
Outcome
bunch yield of plantain at harvestinge1
Direction
follows the order: PME > SP > PCA > PMAe1
Setting
south western Nigeriae0

Verbatim

e0

“on an Alfisol in south western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“bunch yield of plantain at harvesting, the cropping systems follows the order: PME > SP > PCA > PMA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest plantain bunch yield of about 10.39 t/ha was obtained with PME intercropping at 360 kg K/ha.

Taxon
PlantainMusa ABB Groupt0
Treatment
PME intercropping at the rate of 360 kg K ha−1e2
Outcome
bunch yielde2
Direction
Higheste2
Value
10.39 t ha−1e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Plantain Intercropped with Arable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e2

“Highest bunch yield of about 10.39 t ha−1 were obtained with PME intercropping at the rate of 360 kg K ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K fertilizer levels produced significant differences in 50% days to shooting, plant height and number of suckers per stool.

Taxon
PlantainMusa ABB Groupt0
Treatment
varying levels of K fertilizerse3
Outcome
50% days to shooting, plant height, number of suckers/stoole3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Plantain Intercropped with Arable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e3

“At varying levels of K fertilizers significant differences ( p < 0.05) were observed amongst the following morphological parameters: 50% days to shooting, plant height, number of suckers/stool as well as number of fingers/bunch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K fertilizer levels produced significant differences in number of fingers per bunch.

Taxon
PlantainMusa ABB Groupt0
Treatment
varying levels of K fertilizerse3
Outcome
number of fingers/bunche3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Plantain Intercropped with Arable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e3

“At varying levels of K fertilizers significant differences ( p < 0.05) were observed amongst the following morphological parameters: 50% days to shooting, plant height, number of suckers/stool as well as number of fingers/bunch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1198 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled data gave an optimum soil test K between 0.20 and 0.21 cmol kg−1 by the Cate and Nelson model.

Taxon
PlantainMusa ABB Groupt0
Outcome
optimum soil test Ke4
Value
between 0.20 and 0.21 cmol kg−1e4
Qualifier
when these data are poolede4

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Plantain Intercropped with Arable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cate and Nelson model showed that when these data are pooled, optimum soil test K was between 0.20 and 0.21 cmol kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1317 · show in text ↑

Musa ABB Group · yield · Musa x paradisiaca (banana)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · Musa x paradisiaca (banana)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.