Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

EFFECT OF SOIL AMENDMENT WITH THIN STILLAGE AND GLYCEROL ON PLANT GROWTH AND SOIL PROPERTIES

Peiyuan Qian; Jeff Schoenau; Ron Urton

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Controlled environment experiments were set up in 2007 and 2008 to evaluate the potential of using by-products of the biofuel industry as soil amendments to improve fertility and plant growth in Saskatchewan soils. Trials were run with thin stillage (a by-product of ethanol production) and glycerol (by-product of biodiesel production). Canola (B. napus L.) and wheat (T. aestivum) were grown as the test crop in amended pots. Plant yield, composition, and soil properties were measured after five weeks. The stillage was found to be an effective soil amendment for increasing plant biomass yield. Per unit of nitrogen (N) added, canola yields were less than that of urea when nitrogen was the only limitation, due to only a portion of the nitrogen in the thin stillage becoming available over the five week period. However, when nutrients other than nitrogen were limiting, canola dry matter yields with thin stillage amendment approached or exceeded that of urea, due to the ability of the amendments to supply other nutrients such as phosphorus in addition to nitrogen. Glycerol, an amendment that only contains carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, was effective in increasing soil organic carbon content, but required supplemental fertilizer to account for nutrient tie-up by microorganisms during decomposition in the soil. The amendments did not have any biologically significant effects on other soil chemical parameters measured, including soluble metals, pH or salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thin stillage increased plant biomass yield.

Treatment
stillagee0
Outcome
plant biomass yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stillage was found to be an effective soil amendment for increasing plant biomass yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (B. napus L.) and wheat (T. aestivum) were grown as the test crop in amended pots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Per unit nitrogen, canola yield under thin stillage was lower than under urea when nitrogen alone limited growth.

Treatment
thin stillagee1
Outcome
canola yieldse0
Direction
less thane0
Qualifier
when nitrogen was the only limitatione0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Per unit of nitrogen (N) added, canola yields were less than that of urea when nitrogen was the only limitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (B. napus L.) and wheat (T. aestivum) were grown as the test crop in amended pots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“when nutrients other than nitrogen were limiting, canola dry matter yields with thin stillage amendment approached or exceeded that of urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When other nutrients limited growth, canola dry matter yield with stillage approached or exceeded urea.

Treatment
thin stillage amendmente0
Outcome
canola dry matter yieldse0
Direction
approached or exceedede0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when nutrients other than nitrogen were limiting, canola dry matter yields with thin stillage amendment approached or exceeded that of urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (B. napus L.) and wheat (T. aestivum) were grown as the test crop in amended pots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycerol increased soil organic carbon content.

Treatment
Glycerole0
Outcome
soil organic carbon contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glycerol, an amendment that only contains carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, was effective in increasing soil organic carbon content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (B. napus L.) and wheat (T. aestivum) were grown as the test crop in amended pots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–427 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Glycerol required supplemental fertilizer because of nutrient tie-up during decomposition.

Outcome
supplemental fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but required supplemental fertilizer to account for nutrient tie-up by microorganisms during decomposition in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (B. napus L.) and wheat (T. aestivum) were grown as the test crop in amended pots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amendments had no biologically significant effect on soluble metals, pH or salinity.

Treatment
amendmentse0
Outcome
soluble metals, pH or salinitye0
Direction
did not have any biologically significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amendments did not have any biologically significant effects on other soil chemical parameters measured, including soluble metals, pH or salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (B. napus L.) and wheat (T. aestivum) were grown as the test crop in amended pots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–427 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.