Paper · 2008 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Effects of disinfection, packaging and evaporatively cooled storage on sugar content of mango

A. Tefera; Tilahun Seyoum; Kebede Woldetsadik

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to evaluate the effect of post-harvest disinfection, packaging, evaporative cooling storage and their combined effect on the changes in sugar content of mango (Mangifera indica L.). The experiment was laid out in a factorial combination of disinfection, packaging and storage in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The mangoes were periodically analyzed for reducing sugar and total sugar. Non-reducing sugar was computed from the difference between experimental reducing and total sugars. Storage conditions significantly (P  0.01) affected sugar content in mangoes. Storage at ambient conditions with higher temperature and lower relative humidity as compared to the evaporatively cooled storage resulted in rapid deterioration in sugar content of the mangoes. During the storage period, packaging generally maintained higher (P  0.01) levels of reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar and total sugar. Similarly, disinfection treatment significantly (P  0.01) affected the changes in reducing, non-reducing and total sugars of mangoes during storage. Two-way interactions were significant (P  0.01) in terms of the changes in sugar content of mangoes. The benefits of the combined effect of post-harvest treatments on mangoes included maintenance of high reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar and total sugar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage conditions significantly affected sugar content of mango.

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicae0
Treatment
Storage conditionse1
Outcome
sugar contente2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar content of mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“Storage conditions significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–587 · show in text ↑
e2

“affected sugar content in mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambient storage caused rapid deterioration of sugar content compared with evaporatively cooled storage.

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicae0
Treatment
Storage at ambient conditionse3
Outcome
sugar contente3
Direction
rapid deterioratione3
Comparator
evaporatively cooled storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar content of mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–221 · show in text ↑
e3

“Storage at ambient conditions with higher temperature and lower relative humidity as compared to the evaporatively cooled storage resulted in rapid deterioration in sugar content of the mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging maintained higher reducing, non-reducing and total sugar levels during storage.

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicae0
Treatment
packaginge4
Outcome
reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar and total sugare5
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar content of mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–221 · show in text ↑
e4

“packaging generally maintained higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–893 · show in text ↑
e5

“levels of reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar and total sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disinfection significantly affected the changes in reducing, non-reducing and total sugars during storage.

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicae0
Treatment
disinfection treatmente6
Outcome
changes in reducing, non-reducing and total sugarse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar content of mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–221 · show in text ↑
e6

“disinfection treatment significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1014 · show in text ↑
e7

“affected the changes in reducing, non-reducing and total sugars of mangoes during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-way interactions significantly affected the changes in sugar content of mango.

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicae0
Treatment
Two-way interactionse1
Outcome
changes in sugar contente2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar content of mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two-way interactions were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1154 · show in text ↑
e2

“in terms of the changes in sugar content of mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined post-harvest treatments maintained high reducing, non-reducing and total sugar contents.

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicae0
Treatment
combined effect of post-harvest treatmentse1
Outcome
reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar and total sugare1
Direction
highe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar content of mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“The benefits of the combined effect of post-harvest treatments on mangoes included maintenance of high reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar and total sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1372 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.