Paper · 1998 · Bulletin of Entomological Research

Variation in attack by the mahogany shoot borer, Hypsipyla grandella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in relation to host growth and phenology

A.C. Newton; J.P. Cornelius; J.F. Mesén; et al.

16
claims
23
verbatim quotes
27
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In order to evaluate the relationships between attacks by the mahogany shoot borer Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller) and host growth and phenology, field trials of Spanish cedar Cedrela odorata and American mahogany Swietenia macrophylla established in Costa Rica were assessed intensively over an 84 week period. Height growth of C. odorata was approximately twice that of S. macrophylla , with mean growth rates of 2.0 and 1.3 cm week −1 respectively. Cedrela odorata displayed pronounced temporal variation in leaf phenology, with a minimum of 51% of trees in leaf during a relatively dry period. In contrast, the minimum proportion of foliated S. macrophylla trees was 87%. No shoot borer attacks were recorded on S. macrophylla until week 50 after the onset of assessments, whereas initial attacks of C. odorata were recorded during week 6. By week 84, the proportion of trees attacked was 74% and 77%, respectively. In both species, attacks were concentrated in seasonal peaks, coinciding with the production of new shoots. Pronounced spatial variation in attack was observed in both species. At week 12, the number of attacks per block in C. odorata was negatively correlated with available calcium concentration (r=0.85, P <0.001), whereas mean height growth of C. odorata was positively correlated with available phosphate concentration (r=0.84; P <0.0001). Significant variation in height to first damaging attack was observed in both species. By the end of the observational period, only 6% of C. odorata and 0.4% S. macrophylla remained undamaged to a height of 3 m. It is suggested that control methods for the mahogany shoot borer should take account of temporal dynamics in attack, and relationship to host phenology. Manipulation of the soil nutrient status may also form part of an integrated approach to pest management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cedrela height growth was about twice Swietenia height growth, with means of 2.0 and 1.3 cm per week.

Taxon
C. odorataCedrela odoratae0
Outcome
Height growthe0
Direction
approximately twicee0
Value
2.0 and 1.3 cm week −1e0
Comparator
S. macrophyllae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Height growth of C. odorata was approximately twice that of S. macrophylla , with mean growth rates of 2.0 and 1.3 cm week −1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cedrela leaf phenology varied over time and at minimum 51% of trees retained leaves in a dry period.

Taxon
Cedrela odorataCedrela odoratae0
Outcome
trees in leafe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
51%e0
Qualifier
relatively dry periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cedrela odorata displayed pronounced temporal variation in leaf phenology, with a minimum of 51% of trees in leaf during a relatively dry period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–602 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum proportion of foliated Swietenia trees was 87%.

Taxon
S. macrophyllaSwietenia macrophyllae0
Outcome
foliated S. macrophylla treese0
Direction
minimume0
Value
87%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Swietenia macrophylla
Swietenia macrophylla · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum proportion of foliated S. macrophylla trees was 87%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–680 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No Swietenia shoot borer attacks occurred before week 50.

Taxon
S. macrophyllaSwietenia macrophyllae0
Outcome
shoot borer attackse0
Direction
Noe0
Value
week 50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Swietenia macrophylla
Swietenia macrophylla · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No shoot borer attacks were recorded on S. macrophylla until week 50 after the onset of assessments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial Cedrela attacks occurred in week 6.

Taxon
C. odorataCedrela odoratae0
Outcome
initial attackse0
Value
week 6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“initial attacks of C. odorata were recorded during week 6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–848 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By week 84, 74% of Cedrela trees had been attacked.

Taxon
Cedrela odorataCedrela odoratat0
Outcome
proportion of trees attackede0
Value
74%e0
Qualifier
week 84e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By week 84, the proportion of trees attacked was 74% and 77%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spanish cedar Cedrela odorata and American mahogany Swietenia macrophylla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–241 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By week 84, 77% of Swietenia trees had been attacked.

Taxon
Swietenia macrophyllaSwietenia macrophyllat0
Outcome
proportion of trees attackede0
Value
77%e0
Qualifier
week 84e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Swietenia macrophylla
Swietenia macrophylla · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By week 84, the proportion of trees attacked was 74% and 77%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spanish cedar Cedrela odorata and American mahogany Swietenia macrophylla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–241 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Attack peaks in both tree species coincided with new shoot production.

Taxon
Cedrela odorataCedrela odoratat0
Organ / stage
new shootse0
Outcome
attackse0
Direction
seasonal peakse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both species, attacks were concentrated in seasonal peaks, coinciding with the production of new shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spanish cedar Cedrela odorata and American mahogany Swietenia macrophylla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–241 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both tree species showed pronounced spatial variation in attack.

Taxon
Cedrela odorataCedrela odoratat0
Outcome
spatial variation in attacke0
Direction
Pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pronounced spatial variation in attack was observed in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spanish cedar Cedrela odorata and American mahogany Swietenia macrophylla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–241 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cedrela attacks per block were negatively correlated with available calcium at week 12.

Taxon
C. odorataCedrela odoratae0
Compound
calciume0
Outcome
number of attacks per blocke0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Value
r=0.85e0
Qualifier
week 12e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At week 12, the number of attacks per block in C. odorata was negatively correlated with available calcium concentration (r=0.85, P <0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1242 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cedrela height growth was positively correlated with available phosphate.

Taxon
C. odorataCedrela odoratae0
Compound
phosphatee0
Outcome
mean height growthe0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Value
r=0.84e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean height growth of C. odorata was positively correlated with available phosphate concentration (r=0.84; P <0.0001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Height to first damaging attack varied significantly in both species.

Taxon
Cedrela odorataCedrela odoratat0
Outcome
height to first damaging attacke0
Direction
Significant variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant variation in height to first damaging attack was observed in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spanish cedar Cedrela odorata and American mahogany Swietenia macrophylla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–241 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 6% of Cedrela remained undamaged to 3 m by the end of observations.

Taxon
C. odorataCedrela odoratae0
Outcome
remained undamaged to a height of 3 me0
Value
6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 6% of C. odorata and 0.4% S. macrophylla remained undamaged to a height of 3 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 0.4% of Swietenia remained undamaged to 3 m by the end of observations.

Taxon
S. macrophyllaSwietenia macrophyllae0
Outcome
remained undamaged to a height of 3 me0
Value
0.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Swietenia macrophylla
Swietenia macrophylla · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 6% of C. odorata and 0.4% S. macrophylla remained undamaged to a height of 3 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1581 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot borer control should account for seasonal attack and host phenology.

Taxon
Cedrela odorataCedrela odoratat0
Outcome
control methods for the mahogany shoot borer should take account of temporal dynamics in attack, and relationship to host phenologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control methods for the mahogany shoot borer should take account of temporal dynamics in attack, and relationship to host phenology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spanish cedar Cedrela odorata and American mahogany Swietenia macrophylla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–241 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Manipulating soil nutrient status may form part of integrated shoot borer management.

Taxon
Cedrela odorataCedrela odoratat0
Outcome
Manipulation of the soil nutrient status may also form part of an integrated approach to pest managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manipulation of the soil nutrient status may also form part of an integrated approach to pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1841 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spanish cedar Cedrela odorata and American mahogany Swietenia macrophylla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–241 · show in text ↑