Paper · 2004 · Weed Technology

Weed Control and Species Shift in Bromoxynil- and Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Rotation Systems1

KRISHNA N. REDDY

15
claims
15
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted from 1999 through 2001 at Stoneville, MS, to determine the effects of bromoxynil-resistant (BR) and glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton rotation systems under ultranarrow- (25-cm spacing) and wide- (102-cm spacing) row planting on weed control, weed density and shift, and cotton yield. The four rotations during 3 yr included BR–BR–BR, GR–GR–GR, BR–GR–BR, and GR–BR–GR, all with bromoxynil or glyphosate postemergence (POST) only or following fluometuron plus pendimethalin preemergence (PRE). Control of hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, and hyssop spurge was ≥97% regardless of row width, rotation, and herbicide program. Control of common purslane, sicklepod, and smooth pigweed was higher with glyphosate POST in GR cotton than with bromoxynil POST in BR cotton. Broadleaf and yellow nutsedge weed biomass were higher with bromoxynil POST in BR cotton than with glyphosate POST in GR cotton. Continuous BR cotton system resulted in higher densities of common purslane, sicklepod, and yellow nutsedge (15.3, 1.5, and 373 plants/m2, respectively) compared with continuous GR cotton (0.7, 0.1, and 1.0 plant/m2, respectively). Seed cotton yield was consistently higher in wide- than in ultranarrow-row cotton. Seed cotton yield was lower in continuous BR cotton than in the other three rotation systems, and yields greatly improved when BR cotton was rotated with GR cotton. During a 3-yr period, seed cotton yields with glyphosate POST only (4,000 to 4,890 kg/ha) or after PRE herbicides (4,480 to 4,860 kg/ha) were similar in GR cotton, whereas in BR cotton, bromoxynil POST only (1,390 to 4,280 kg/ha) resulted in lower yield than did bromoxynil POST after PRE herbicides (2,550 to 4,480 kg/ha). The results indicated that the shift in spectrum of weeds toward more tolerant species and yield decline in continuous BR cotton can be prevented by rotating BR with GR cotton.Nomenclature: Bromoxynil; fluometuron; glyphosate; pendimethalin; common purslane, Portulaca oleracea L. #3 POROL; hemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex A.W. Hill # SEBEX; hyssop spurge, Euphorbia hyssopifolia L. # EPHHS; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin & Barneby # CASOB; smooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACH; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘BXN 47’, ‘DP 436 RR’.Additional index words: Bromoxynil, fluometuron, glyphosate, pendimethalin, rotation, transgenic cotton, weed density, weed shift.Abbreviations: BR, bromoxynil resistant; GR, glyphosate resistant; POST, postemergence; PRE, preemergence; WAA, weeks after second POST application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four weeds were controlled at at least 97% across row widths, rotations and herbicide programs.

Treatment
rotatione0
Outcome
Control of hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, and hyssop spurgee0
Value
≥97%e0
Comparator
row widthe0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Control of hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, and hyssop spurge was ≥97% regardless of row width, rotation, and herbicide program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate POST in GR cotton gave higher common purslane control than bromoxynil POST in BR cotton.

Treatment
glyphosate POST in GR cottone0
Interactor
common purslanee0weed
Outcome
Control of common purslanee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
bromoxynil POST in BR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of common purslane, sicklepod, and smooth pigweed was higher with glyphosate POST in GR cotton than with bromoxynil POST in BR cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate POST gave higher sicklepod control.

Treatment
glyphosate POST in GR cottone0
Interactor
sicklepode0weed
Outcome
sicklepode0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
bromoxynil POST in BR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of common purslane, sicklepod, and smooth pigweed was higher with glyphosate POST in GR cotton than with bromoxynil POST in BR cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate POST gave higher smooth pigweed control.

Treatment
glyphosate POST in GR cottone0
Interactor
smooth pigweedAmaranthus hybriduse0weed
Outcome
smooth pigweede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
bromoxynil POST in BR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus hybridus
Amaranthus hybridus · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of common purslane, sicklepod, and smooth pigweed was higher with glyphosate POST in GR cotton than with bromoxynil POST in BR cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadleaf weed biomass was higher with bromoxynil POST.

Treatment
bromoxynil POST in BR cottone0
Interactor
Broadleafe0weed
Outcome
Broadleafe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
glyphosate POST in GR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadleaf and yellow nutsedge weed biomass were higher with bromoxynil POST in BR cotton than with glyphosate POST in GR cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow nutsedge biomass was higher with bromoxynil POST.

Treatment
bromoxynil POST in BR cottone0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedge weed biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
glyphosate POST in GR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadleaf and yellow nutsedge weed biomass were higher with bromoxynil POST in BR cotton than with glyphosate POST in GR cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous BR had higher common purslane density than continuous GR.

Treatment
Continuous BR cotton systeme0
Interactor
common purslanee0weed
Outcome
densities of common purslanee0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.3e0
Comparator
continuous GR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous BR cotton system resulted in higher densities of common purslane, sicklepod, and yellow nutsedge (15.3, 1.5, and 373 plants/m2, respectively) compared with continuous GR cotton (0.7, 0.1, and 1.0 plant/m2, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous BR had higher sicklepod density than continuous GR.

Treatment
Continuous BR cotton systeme0
Interactor
sicklepode0weed
Outcome
sicklepode0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.5e0
Comparator
continuous GR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous BR cotton system resulted in higher densities of common purslane, sicklepod, and yellow nutsedge (15.3, 1.5, and 373 plants/m2, respectively) compared with continuous GR cotton (0.7, 0.1, and 1.0 plant/m2, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous BR had higher yellow nutsedge density than continuous GR.

Treatment
Continuous BR cotton systeme0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedgee0
Direction
highere0
Value
373 plants/m2e0
Comparator
continuous GR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous BR cotton system resulted in higher densities of common purslane, sicklepod, and yellow nutsedge (15.3, 1.5, and 373 plants/m2, respectively) compared with continuous GR cotton (0.7, 0.1, and 1.0 plant/m2, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide rows gave higher seed cotton yield than ultranarrow rows.

Treatment
wide-e0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ultranarrow-row cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed cotton yield was consistently higher in wide- than in ultranarrow-row cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous BR cotton yielded less than the other rotation systems.

Treatment
continuous BR cottone0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the other three rotation systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed cotton yield was lower in continuous BR cotton than in the other three rotation systems, and yields greatly improved when BR cotton was rotated with GR cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotating BR cotton with GR cotton greatly improved yield.

Treatment
BR cotton was rotated with GR cottone0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
greatly improvede0
Comparator
continuous BR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed cotton yield was lower in continuous BR cotton than in the other three rotation systems, and yields greatly improved when BR cotton was rotated with GR cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GR cotton yields were similar with glyphosate POST alone or after PRE herbicides.

Treatment
glyphosate POST onlye0
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Value
4,000 to 4,890 kg/hae0
Qualifier
4,480 to 4,860 kg/hae0
Comparator
after PRE herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed cotton yields with glyphosate POST only (4,000 to 4,890 kg/ha) or after PRE herbicides (4,480 to 4,860 kg/ha) were similar in GR cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In BR cotton, bromoxynil POST alone gave lower yields than after PRE herbicides.

Treatment
bromoxynil POST onlye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1,390 to 4,280 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2,550 to 4,480 kg/hae0
Comparator
bromoxynil POST after PRE herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in BR cotton, bromoxynil POST only (1,390 to 4,280 kg/ha) resulted in lower yield than did bromoxynil POST after PRE herbicides (2,550 to 4,480 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1741 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded rotating BR with GR cotton can prevent weed shifts and yield decline.

Outcome
prevented by rotating BR with GR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shift in spectrum of weeds toward more tolerant species and yield decline in continuous BR cotton can be prevented by rotating BR with GR cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1918 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

61 papers: 35 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Glyphosate program net returns were at least as high as those using midseason bromoxynil, pyrithiobac, or fluometuron plus MSMA.

    Economic assessment of weed management for transgenic and nontransgenic cotton in tilled and nontilled systems · 2002 · compared with programs that used midseason treatments of bromoxynil, pyrithiobac, or fluometuron plus MSMA

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

glyphosate · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 38 positive, 3 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

glyphosate · Amaranthus hybridus · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

rotation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 26 positive, 17 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

herbicide · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 57 positive, 11 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.