Abstract
Experiments were conducted in weed-free environments to determine corn tolerance to trifloxysulfuron applied PRE or POST, and to determine the potential for trifloxysulfuron applied PRE or POST to cotton to injure corn grown in rotation the following year. Trifloxysulfuron at 3.75, 7.5, or 15 g ai/ha applied PRE or POST resulted in 98% stand reduction of imidazolinone-tolerant (IT) corn and 100% stand reduction in conventional corn. No injury occurred to imidazolinone-resistant (IR) corn. A corn cultivar yield response was observed, with conventional nontreated corn yielding 8,850 kg/ha and greater than nontreated IT corn at 7,900 kg/ha. Nontreated IR corn yielded the least, at 6,400 kg/ha, and these yields were equivalent to trifloxysulfuron-treated IR corn at 6,590 kg/ha. Cotton treated with trifloxysulfuron PRE at any rate was injured less than 8%. Both trifloxysulfuron at 7.5 g/ha POST and pyrithiobac at 70 g ai/ha POST injured cotton 11% early in the season. Neither trifloxysulfuron nor pyrithiobac influenced weed-free cotton lint yields. When grown in rotation, corn was not injured by trifloxysulfuron or pyrithiobac applied the previous year to cotton, and yields were not influenced.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Trifloxysulfuron applied PRE or POST reduced stand of imidazolinone-tolerant corn by 98%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0 - Material
- imidazolinone-tolerant (IT) corne0
- Treatment
- Trifloxysulfuron at 3.75, 7.5, or 15 g ai/ha applied PRE or POSTe0
- Outcome
- stande0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 98%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trifloxysulfuron at 3.75, 7.5, or 15 g ai/ha applied PRE or POST resulted in 98% stand reduction of imidazolinone-tolerant (IT) corn and 100% stand reduction in conventional corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Trifloxysulfuron applied PRE or POST reduced stand of conventional corn by 100%.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Material
- conventional corne0
- Treatment
- Trifloxysulfuron at 3.75, 7.5, or 15 g ai/ha applied PRE or POSTe0
- Outcome
- stande0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 100%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trifloxysulfuron at 3.75, 7.5, or 15 g ai/ha applied PRE or POST resulted in 98% stand reduction of imidazolinone-tolerant (IT) corn and 100% stand reduction in conventional corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Trifloxysulfuron applied PRE or POST caused no injury to imidazolinone-resistant corn.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Material
- imidazolinone-resistant (IR) corne1
- Treatment
- Trifloxysulfuron at 3.75, 7.5, or 15 g ai/ha applied PRE or POSTe0
- Outcome
- injurye1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trifloxysulfuron at 3.75, 7.5, or 15 g ai/ha applied PRE or POST resulted in 98% stand reduction of imidazolinone-tolerant (IT) corn and 100% stand reduction in conventional corn”
e1“No injury occurred to imidazolinone-resistant (IR) corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional nontreated corn yielded 8,850 kg/ha, more than nontreated IT corn at 7,900 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Material
- conventional nontreated corne0
- Outcome
- yield responsee0
- Direction
- greater thane0
- Value
- 8,850 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 7,900 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- nontreated IT corne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A corn cultivar yield response was observed, with conventional nontreated corn yielding 8,850 kg/ha and greater than nontreated IT corn at 7,900 kg/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Nontreated IR corn yielded 6,400 kg/ha, equivalent to trifloxysulfuron-treated IR corn at 6,590 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Material
- IR corne0
- Treatment
- trifloxysulfuron-treatede0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- equivalente0
- Value
- 6,590 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- Nontreated IR corne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nontreated IR corn yielded the least, at 6,400 kg/ha, and these yields were equivalent to trifloxysulfuron-treated IR corn at 6,590 kg/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton treated with trifloxysulfuron PRE was injured by less than 8%.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- trifloxysulfuron PREe0
- Outcome
- injurede0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cotton treated with trifloxysulfuron PRE at any rate was injured less than 8%”
Claim · model-written summary
Trifloxysulfuron at 7.5 g/ha POST injured cotton by 11% early in the season.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- trifloxysulfuron at 7.5 g/ha POSTe0
- Outcome
- injurede0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 11%e0
- Qualifier
- early in the seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both trifloxysulfuron at 7.5 g/ha POST and pyrithiobac at 70 g ai/ha POST injured cotton 11% early in the season”
Claim · model-written summary
Pyrithiobac at 70 g ai/ha POST injured cotton by 11% early in the season.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- pyrithiobac at 70 g ai/ha POSTe0
- Outcome
- injurede0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 11%e0
- Qualifier
- early in the seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both trifloxysulfuron at 7.5 g/ha POST and pyrithiobac at 70 g ai/ha POST injured cotton 11% early in the season”
Claim · model-written summary
Neither trifloxysulfuron nor pyrithiobac influenced weed-free cotton lint yield.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- trifloxysulfuron nor pyrithiobace0
- Outcome
- cotton lint yieldse0
- Direction
- influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neither trifloxysulfuron nor pyrithiobac influenced weed-free cotton lint yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn grown in rotation after trifloxysulfuron or pyrithiobac on cotton the previous year was not injured.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- trifloxysulfuron or pyrithiobac applied the previous year to cottone0
- Outcome
- injurede0
- Direction
- not injurede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When grown in rotation, corn was not injured by trifloxysulfuron or pyrithiobac applied the previous year to cotton, and yields were not influenced”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn yields in rotation were not influenced by trifloxysulfuron or pyrithiobac applied to cotton the previous year.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- trifloxysulfuron or pyrithiobac applied the previous year to cottone0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When grown in rotation, corn was not injured by trifloxysulfuron or pyrithiobac applied the previous year to cotton, and yields were not influenced”
The same questions in other papers
Gossypium hirsutum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.