Paper · 2005 · Weed Technology

Yield and Physiological Response of Nontransgenic Cotton to Simulated Glyphosate Drift1

WALTER E. THOMAS; IAN C. BURKE; BRIDGET L. ROBINSON; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2001 in Lewiston, NC, and in 2002 at Clayton and Lewiston, NC, to investigate the response of nontransgenic cotton to simulated glyphosate drift in a weed-free environment. Nontransgenic cotton variety ‘Fibermax 989’ was planted in a conventional seedbed at all locations. Glyphosate treatments were applied early postemergence (EPOST) at the four-leaf growth stage of cotton at 0, 8.7, 17.5, 35, 70, 140, 280, 560, and 1,120 g ai/ha and represent 0, 0.78, 1.55, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100% of the commercial use rate, respectively. Rates as low as 140 g/ha caused lint yield reductions depending on year and location. When averaged over all locations, lint yield reductions of 4, 49, 72, and 87% compared with nontreated cotton were observed with glyphosate rates of 140, 280, 560, and 1,120 g/ha, respectively. Visual injury and shikimic acid accumulation were evident at glyphosate rates greater or equal to 70 g/ha. Collectively, visual injury and shikimic acid accumulation at 7 d after EPOST treatment might be used as a diagnostic indicator to predict potential yield reductions from simulated glyphosate drift.Nomenclature: Glyphosate; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Fibermax 989’.Additional index words: Shikimic acid.Abbreviations: DAT, days after early postemergence treatment; DD, degree-day; EPOST, early postemergence; EPSPS, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase [EC 2.5.1.19]; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; PDS, postemergence-directed; POST, postemergence; PRE, preemergence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 140 g/ha reduced lint yield by 4% versus nontreated cotton across locations.

Material
‘Fibermax 989’e1
Treatment
glyphosate rates of 140e0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
4e0
Comparator
nontreated cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lint yield reductions of 4, 49, 72, and 87% compared with nontreated cotton were observed with glyphosate rates of 140, 280, 560, and 1,120 g/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“nontransgenic cotton variety ‘Fibermax 989’”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 205–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 280 g/ha reduced lint yield by 49% versus nontreated cotton.

Material
‘Fibermax 989’e1
Treatment
280e0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
49e0
Comparator
nontreated cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lint yield reductions of 4, 49, 72, and 87% compared with nontreated cotton were observed with glyphosate rates of 140, 280, 560, and 1,120 g/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“nontransgenic cotton variety ‘Fibermax 989’”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 205–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 560 g/ha reduced lint yield by 72% versus nontreated cotton.

Material
‘Fibermax 989’e1
Treatment
560e0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
72e0
Comparator
nontreated cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lint yield reductions of 4, 49, 72, and 87% compared with nontreated cotton were observed with glyphosate rates of 140, 280, 560, and 1,120 g/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“nontransgenic cotton variety ‘Fibermax 989’”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 205–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 1,120 g/ha reduced lint yield by 87% versus nontreated cotton.

Material
‘Fibermax 989’e1
Treatment
1,120 g/hae0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
87%e0
Comparator
nontreated cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lint yield reductions of 4, 49, 72, and 87% compared with nontreated cotton were observed with glyphosate rates of 140, 280, 560, and 1,120 g/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“nontransgenic cotton variety ‘Fibermax 989’”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 205–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 70 g/ha or more produced visible injury in cotton.

Material
‘Fibermax 989’e1
Treatment
glyphosate rates greater or equal to 70 g/hae0
Outcome
Visual injurye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visual injury and shikimic acid accumulation were evident at glyphosate rates greater or equal to 70 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–957 · show in text ↑
e1

“nontransgenic cotton variety ‘Fibermax 989’”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 205–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 70 g/ha or more caused shikimic acid accumulation in cotton.

Material
‘Fibermax 989’e1
Treatment
glyphosate rates greater or equal to 70 g/hae0
Outcome
shikimic acid accumulatione0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visual injury and shikimic acid accumulation were evident at glyphosate rates greater or equal to 70 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–957 · show in text ↑
e1

“nontransgenic cotton variety ‘Fibermax 989’”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 205–248 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visible injury and shikimic acid accumulation at 7 days after EPOST might predict glyphosate drift yield loss.

Material
‘Fibermax 989’e1
Outcome
diagnostic indicator to predict potential yield reductionse0
Qualifier
might be usede0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“visual injury and shikimic acid accumulation at 7 d after EPOST treatment might be used as a diagnostic indicator to predict potential yield reductions from simulated glyphosate drift”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“nontransgenic cotton variety ‘Fibermax 989’”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 205–248 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

glyphosate · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

glyphosate · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 4 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.