Abstract
Field studies were conducted near Archer, FL, and Vienna, GA, in 1995 and 1996 to investigate the effects of pyridate formulation and adjuvants on broadleaf weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Pyridate formulations SAN 319H 450EC 361LZ, SAN 319H 450EC 216LZ, and SAN 319H 600EC 418LZ were evaluated at two rates, 1.07 and 2.14 kg/ha. Pyridate at 1.07 kg/ha plus 2,4-DB at 0.23 kg/ha were evaluated alone and with five adjuvants. The adjuvants included a crop oil concentrate, a nonionic surfactant, a nonionic surfactant with organosilicone blend, urea ammonium nitrate plus a nonionic surfactant, and chlorothalonil (a fungicide) plus a nonionic surfactant. No pyridate treatment injured peanut. Pyridate formulation did not affect broadleaf weed control. Increasing pyridate rate increased weed control and yield. Mixing 2,4-DB with pyridate generally enhanced sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control. Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum), smallflower morningglory (Jacquemontia tamnifolia), hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta), sicklepod, and common cocklebur control with pyridate was not enhanced by adjuvants. Adding chlorothalonil to pyridate plus 2,4-DB did not affect weed control or peanut injury.Nomenclature: 2,4-DB; chlorothalonil; tetrachloroisophthalonitrile; pyridate; common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium #3 XANST; Florida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum # DEDTO; hairy indigo, Indigofera hirsuta # INDHI; peanut, Arachis hypogaea ‘Sunrunner’ and ‘GK-7’; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia # CASOB; smallflower morningglory, Jacquemontia tamnifolia # IAQTA.Additional index words: SAN 319H 450EC 361LZ, SAN 319H 450EC 216LZ, SAN 319H 600EC 418LZ, crop oil concentrate, nonionic surfactant, organosilicone-nonionic surfactant blend, urea ammonium nitrate.Abbreviations: COC, crop oil concentrate; NIS, nonionic surfactant; NIS/OS, nonionic surfactant with organosilicone; POST, postemergence; WAT, weeks after treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
No pyridate treatment injured peanut.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- pyridatee0
- Outcome
- injured peanute0
- Direction
- No pyridate treatment injurede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“No pyridate treatment injured peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Pyridate formulation did not affect broadleaf weed control.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Pyridate formulatione1
- Outcome
- broadleaf weed controle1
- Direction
- did not affecte1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e1“Pyridate formulation did not affect broadleaf weed control”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing pyridate rate increased broadleaf weed control in peanut.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Increasing pyridate ratee2
- Outcome
- weed controle2
- Direction
- increasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e2“Increasing pyridate rate increased weed control and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing pyridate rate increased peanut yield.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Increasing pyridate ratee2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e2“Increasing pyridate rate increased weed control and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixing 2,4-DB with pyridate generally enhanced control of sicklepod and common cocklebur in peanut.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Mixing 2,4-DB with pyridatee3
- Interactor
- sicklepode3weed
- Second interactor
- common cocklebure3weed
- Outcome
- controle3
- Direction
- enhancede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e3“Mixing 2,4-DB with pyridate generally enhanced sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control”
Claim · model-written summary
Adjuvants did not enhance control of Florida beggarweed and smallflower morningglory with pyridate.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- adjuvantse4
- Interactor
- Florida beggarweed
Desmodium tortuosume4weed - Second interactor
- smallflower morningglorye4weed
- Outcome
- controle4
- Direction
- was not enhancede4
- Qualifier
- hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta), sicklepod, and common cocklebure4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e4“Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum), smallflower morningglory (Jacquemontia tamnifolia), hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta), sicklepod, and common cocklebur control with pyridate was not enhanced by adjuvants”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding chlorothalonil to pyridate plus 2,4-DB did not affect weed control in peanut.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Adding chlorothalonil to pyridate plus 2,4-DBe5
- Outcome
- weed controle5
- Direction
- did not affecte5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e5“Adding chlorothalonil to pyridate plus 2,4-DB did not affect weed control or peanut injury”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding chlorothalonil to pyridate plus 2,4-DB did not affect peanut injury.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Adding chlorothalonil to pyridate plus 2,4-DBe5
- Outcome
- peanut injurye5
- Direction
- did not affecte5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e5“Adding chlorothalonil to pyridate plus 2,4-DB did not affect weed control or peanut injury”
The same questions in other papers
Pyridate · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
Pyridate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
Pyridate · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Pyridate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- negative
- negative
chlorothalonil · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.