Paper · 2012

EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT FUNGICIDES AND ANTIBIOTICS AGAINST BACTERIAL LEAF BLIGHT IN RICE

Sana Ullah Chaudhary; Javed Iqbal; Muzzammil Hussain

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effectiveness of some fungicides and antibiotics for the control of bacterial leaf blight in rice was tested at Adaptive Research Farm, Gujranwala, Pakistan and farmer’s field (tehsil Wazirabad, Gujranwala), during Kharif, 2006-2008. The Bordeaux mixture (2.5:2.5:300 i.e. 2.5 kg copper sulphate, 2.5 kg quick lime and 300 l/ha water), copper oxychloride 50% (1.25 kg/ha), oxytetracycline (0.75 l/ha) and streptomycin (0.50 kg/ha) alone and in combination with each other were tested and compared with untreated plot. Significantly low incidence of bacterial leaf blight was recorded when Bordeaux mixture alone (40.89 and 44.06 %) and in combination with oxytetracycline (38.67 and 42.67 %) and streptomycin (36.89 and 39.55 %) were applied as compared to control (56.00 and 63.45%) at the research farm and farmer’s field, respectively. These three treatments also gave maximum yield i.e 4.24, 4.27 and 4.34 tons per hectare at research farm and 3.45, 3.46 and 3.52 tons per hectare at farmer’s field, respectively. Bordeaux mixture alone gave maximum net return (Rs. 9375 /ha) followed by its combination with oxytetracycline (Rs. 8975/ha) and streptomycin (Rs. 8375 /ha). A loss of Rs.950, Rs.1550 and Rs.1700 per hectare occurred by the application of oxytetracycline streptomycin alone and their combination with each other, respectively, which is attributed to noneffectiveness of antibiotics and their high price. It is concluded that Bordeaux mixture proved more effective, broad spectrum and economical than copper oxychloride and antibiotics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bordeaux mixture alone significantly lowered bacterial leaf blight incidence to 40.89% and 44.06% at farm and farmer field versus controls.

Treatment
Bordeaux mixture alonee0
Outcome
incidence of bacterial leaf blighte0
Direction
lowe0
Value
40.89 and 44.06 %e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly low incidence of bacterial leaf blight was recorded when Bordeaux mixture alone (40.89 and 44.06 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–631 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to control (56.00 and 63.45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bordeaux mixture with oxytetracycline significantly lowered leaf blight incidence to 38.67% and 42.67%.

Treatment
oxytetracyclinee0
Outcome
incidence of bacterial leaf blighte1
Direction
lowe1
Value
38.67 and 42.67 %e0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in combination with oxytetracycline (38.67 and 42.67 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–691 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly low incidence of bacterial leaf blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–570 · show in text ↑
e2

“control (56.00 and 63.45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bordeaux mixture with streptomycin significantly lowered leaf blight incidence to 36.89% and 39.55%.

Treatment
streptomycine0
Outcome
incidence of bacterial leaf blighte1
Direction
lowe1
Value
36.89 and 39.55 %e0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“streptomycin (36.89 and 39.55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–728 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly low incidence of bacterial leaf blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–570 · show in text ↑
e2

“control (56.00 and 63.45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three Bordeaux treatments gave maximum rice yields at both sites.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.24, 4.27 and 4.34 tons per hectaree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These three treatments also gave maximum yield i.e 4.24, 4.27 and 4.34 tons per hectare at research farm and 3.45, 3.46 and 3.52 tons per hectare at farmer’s field, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bordeaux mixture alone gave the maximum net return of Rs. 9375 /ha.

Treatment
Bordeaux mixture alonee0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 9375 /hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bordeaux mixture alone gave maximum net return (Rs. 9375 /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Bordeaux plus oxytetracycline treatment returned Rs. 8975/ha.

Treatment
oxytetracyclinee0
Outcome
combination with oxytetracyclinee0
Value
Rs. 8975/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its combination with oxytetracycline (Rs. 8975/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Bordeaux plus streptomycin treatment returned Rs. 8375 /ha.

Treatment
streptomycine0
Outcome
streptomycine0
Value
Rs. 8375 /hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“streptomycin (Rs. 8375 /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antibiotic treatments caused economic losses of Rs.950, Rs.1550 and Rs.1700 per hectare.

Outcome
losse0
Value
Rs.950, Rs.1550 and Rs.1700 per hectaree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A loss of Rs.950, Rs.1550 and Rs.1700 per hectare occurred by the application of oxytetracycline streptomycin alone and their combination with each other, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude Bordeaux mixture is more effective and economical than copper oxychloride and antibiotics.

Outcome
more effective, broad spectrum and economicale0
Comparator
copper oxychloride and antibioticse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bordeaux mixture proved more effective, broad spectrum and economical than copper oxychloride and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1552 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑

streptomycin · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.