Paper · 2006 · HortScience

Weed Control in Processing Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) with Rimsulfuron and Thifensulfuron Applied Alone or with Chlorothalonil or Copper Pesticides

Darren E. Robinson; Nader Soltani; Allan S. Hamill; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Combining herbicides and fungicides can improve production efficiency; however, there is little information on the effect of these mixtures on weed control and processing tomato crop response. Six field trials were conducted from 2002 to 2004 in Ontario to study the effect of rimsulfuron and thifensulfuron applied alone or in combination with metribuzin and with or without chlorothalonil or copper fungicides on processing tomato. There was no visual injury or reduction in marketable yield of processing tomato with rimsulfuron or thifensulfuron alone or when tank-mixed with chlorothalonil or copper hydroxide. Rimsulfuron, thifensulfuron, rimsulfuron plus metribuzin, and thifensulfuron plus metribuzin could be tank-mixed with chlorothalonil without a reduction in weed control. However, efficacy of rimsulfuron and thifensulfuron were reduced when tank-mixed with copper hydroxide. The reduction in weed control incited by adding copper hydroxide was overcome with a low rate (150 g·ha –1 a.i.) of metribuzin for thifensulfuron but not rimsulfuron. Application of rimsulfuron and thifensulfuron alone or with low rates of metribuzin and chlorothalonil could provide tomato growers with a single-pass treatment for the control of troublesome weeds and diseases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rimsulfuron or thifensulfuron alone, or tank-mixed with chlorothalonil or copper hydroxide, caused no visual injury or reduction in marketable yield of processing tomato.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
rimsulfuron or thifensulfuron alone or when tank-mixed with chlorothalonil or copper hydroxidee0
Outcome
visual injury or reduction in marketable yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Control in Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no visual injury or reduction in marketable yield of processing tomato with rimsulfuron or thifensulfuron alone or when tank-mixed with chlorothalonil or copper hydroxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rimsulfuron, thifensulfuron and their metribuzin mixes could be tank-mixed with chlorothalonil without a reduction in weed control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
tank-mixed with chlorothalonile1
Outcome
weed controle1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Control in Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rimsulfuron, thifensulfuron, rimsulfuron plus metribuzin, and thifensulfuron plus metribuzin could be tank-mixed with chlorothalonil without a reduction in weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficacy of rimsulfuron and thifensulfuron was reduced when tank-mixed with copper hydroxide.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
tank-mixed with copper hydroxidee2
Outcome
efficacye2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Control in Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, efficacy of rimsulfuron and thifensulfuron were reduced when tank-mixed with copper hydroxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in weed control caused by copper hydroxide was overcome by a low rate of metribuzin for thifensulfuron.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
low rate (150 g·ha –1 a.i.) of metribuzine3
Outcome
reduction in weed controle3
Direction
overcomee3
Qualifier
for thifensulfurone3
Comparator
copper hydroxidee3

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Control in Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e3

“The reduction in weed control incited by adding copper hydroxide was overcome with a low rate (150 g·ha –1 a.i.) of metribuzin for thifensulfuron but not rimsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in weed control caused by copper hydroxide was not overcome by metribuzin for rimsulfuron.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
low rate (150 g·ha –1 a.i.) of metribuzine3
Outcome
reduction in weed controle3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
but not rimsulfurone3
Comparator
copper hydroxidee3

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Control in Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e3

“The reduction in weed control incited by adding copper hydroxide was overcome with a low rate (150 g·ha –1 a.i.) of metribuzin for thifensulfuron but not rimsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1055 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rimsulfuron or thifensulfuron alone, or with low rates of metribuzin and chlorothalonil, could give tomato growers a single-pass treatment for troublesome weeds and diseases.

Outcome
control of troublesome weeds and diseasese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Application of rimsulfuron and thifensulfuron alone or with low rates of metribuzin and chlorothalonil could provide tomato growers with a single-pass treatment for the control of troublesome weeds and diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1267 · show in text ↑

thifensulfuron · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Copper hydroxide · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

rimsulfuron · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

chlorothalonil · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.