Paper · 2006 · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)

Influence of cropping system intensity on dry matter yield and nitrogen concentration in different parts of soybean plant

Ana Pospišil; Boris Varga; Zlatko Svečnjak; et al.

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Summary Two-year investigations were conducted within the three-year maize-soybeanwheat crop rotation with the aim to assess the infl uence of two cropping systems, conditionally marked as high-input and reduced-input systems, on soybean dry matter yield and nitrogen concentration in its diff erent plant parts. Th e high-input system was characterized by: ploughing at 30-32 cm, fertilization with 80 kg N and 130 P 2 O 5 and K 2 O kg ha-1, weed control based on oxasulfuron and, if required, a corrective treatment with propachizafop and bentazone. Th e reduced-input system involved: ploughing at 20-22 cm, fertilization with a total of 40 kg N and 130 kg P 2 O 5 and K 2 O kg ha -1 , and only oxasulfuron-based weed control. Investigations involved two soybean genotypes: L 940596 and L 910631, vegetation group I. An identical monofactorial trial with four replications was set up in each cropping system. Cropping system intensity had a positive eff ect on leaf and stem dry matter mass in 2002, and on leaf and stem nitrogen concentration, whereas it had no eff ect on pod dry matter, seed yield and seed nitrogen concentrations in either year. Th e highest leaf dry matter was recorded in R4 development stage and that of stem and pod without seeds in R 7 development stage. In both trial years, the highest nitrogen concentrations in leaf and stem were recorded in R1 development stage. In both trial years, higher pod nitrogen concentration was achieved in R 4 development stage than in the R7 stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-input cropping increased leaf and stem dry matter mass in 2002 compared with reduced input.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
L 940596 and L 910631e3
Organ / stage
leaf and steme1
Treatment
Cropping system intensitye1
Outcome
leaf and stem dry matter masse1
Direction
positivee1
Qualifier
in 2002e1
Comparator
reduced-input systeme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cropping system intensity had a positive eff ect on leaf and stem dry matter mass in 2002, and on leaf and stem nitrogen concentration, whereas it had no eff ect on pod dry matter, seed yield and seed nitrogen concentrations in either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1151 · show in text ↑
e2

“conditionally marked as high-input and reduced-input systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–225 · show in text ↑
e3

“Investigations involved two soybean genotypes: L 940596 and L 910631”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system intensity had a positive effect on leaf and stem nitrogen concentration in 2002.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
L 940596 and L 910631e3
Organ / stage
leaf and steme1
Treatment
Cropping system intensitye1
Outcome
leaf and stem nitrogen concentratione1
Direction
positivee1
Qualifier
in 2002e1
Comparator
reduced-input systeme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cropping system intensity had a positive eff ect on leaf and stem dry matter mass in 2002, and on leaf and stem nitrogen concentration, whereas it had no eff ect on pod dry matter, seed yield and seed nitrogen concentrations in either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1151 · show in text ↑
e2

“conditionally marked as high-input and reduced-input systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–225 · show in text ↑
e3

“Investigations involved two soybean genotypes: L 940596 and L 910631”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system intensity had no effect on pod dry matter, seed yield or seed nitrogen concentration in either year.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
L 940596 and L 910631e3
Organ / stage
pode1
Treatment
Cropping system intensitye1
Outcome
pod dry matter, seed yield and seed nitrogen concentrationse1
Direction
no eff ecte1
Qualifier
in either yeare1
Comparator
reduced-input systeme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cropping system intensity had a positive eff ect on leaf and stem dry matter mass in 2002, and on leaf and stem nitrogen concentration, whereas it had no eff ect on pod dry matter, seed yield and seed nitrogen concentrations in either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1151 · show in text ↑
e2

“conditionally marked as high-input and reduced-input systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–225 · show in text ↑
e3

“Investigations involved two soybean genotypes: L 940596 and L 910631”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–798 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry matter was highest at the R4 development stage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
R4 development stagee4
Outcome
leaf dry mattere4
Direction
higheste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest leaf dry matter was recorded in R4 development stage”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1153–1218 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem and pod dry matter without seeds was highest at the R7 development stage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
stem and pod without seedse5
Outcome
dry mattere4
Direction
higheste4
Qualifier
R 7 development stagee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest leaf dry matter was recorded in R4 development stage”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1153–1218 · show in text ↑
e5

“and that of stem and pod without seeds in R 7 development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1282 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and stem nitrogen concentrations were highest at the R1 development stage in both trial years.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
leaf and steme6
Outcome
nitrogen concentrationse6
Direction
higheste6
Qualifier
R1 development stagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–121 · show in text ↑
e6

“In both trial years, the highest nitrogen concentrations in leaf and stem were recorded in R1 development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1395 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod nitrogen concentration was higher at the R4 than at the R7 stage in both trial years.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
pode7
Outcome
pod nitrogen concentratione7
Direction
highere7
Qualifier
R 4 development stagee7
Comparator
R7 stagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–121 · show in text ↑
e7

“In both trial years, higher pod nitrogen concentration was achieved in R 4 development stage than in the R7 stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1510 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cultivation system · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 35 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.