Paper · 1993 · HortScience

Evaluating Sweet Onion Cultivars for Sugar Concentrations and Pungency

Charles S. Vavrina; Doyle A. Smittle

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Six onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivars were grown during 2 years to evaluate the effects of environment on bulb quality as measured by sugar and pyruvate (pungency) concentrations. Within each year, bulb fresh weight was not affected by cultivar; however, bulb fresh weights were 36% higher in a year when most of the rain fell during maximum bulb expansion. Total bulb sugar concentration and pungency varied among cultivars and years. Pungency was higher and the sugar: pungency ratio was lower in `Texas 1015Y' and `Sweet Georgia' than in `Dessex', `Rio Bravo', 'Hybrid Yellow Granex', and `Granex 33'. Under low S nutrition, market acceptance of “sweet” onion cultivars that vary slightly in nonstructural water-soluble carbohydrates may be assessed more precisely by the sugar: pungency ratio than by sugar or pungency assessments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb fresh weight did not differ by cultivar within either year.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
cultivare0
Outcome
bulb fresh weighte0
Direction
not affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within each year, bulb fresh weight was not affected by cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb fresh weight was 36% higher in the year with rain during maximum bulb expansion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
bulb fresh weightse0
Direction
highere0
Value
36%e0
Setting
a year when most of the rain fell during maximum bulb expansione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulb fresh weights were 36% higher in a year when most of the rain fell during maximum bulb expansion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total bulb sugar concentration varied by cultivar and year.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
Total bulb sugar concentratione0
Setting
yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total bulb sugar concentration and pungency varied among cultivars and years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb pungency varied by cultivar and year.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
pungencye0
Setting
yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total bulb sugar concentration and pungency varied among cultivars and years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pungency was higher in Texas 1015Y than in four comparison cultivars.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Texas 1015Ye0
Outcome
Pungencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Dessexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pungency was higher and the sugar: pungency ratio was lower in `Texas 1015Y' and `Sweet Georgia' than in `Dessex', `Rio Bravo', 'Hybrid Yellow Granex', and `Granex 33'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pungency was higher in Sweet Georgia than in four comparison cultivars.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Sweet Georgiae0
Outcome
Pungencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Dessexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pungency was higher and the sugar: pungency ratio was lower in `Texas 1015Y' and `Sweet Georgia' than in `Dessex', `Rio Bravo', 'Hybrid Yellow Granex', and `Granex 33'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sugar:pungency ratio was lower in Texas 1015Y than in four comparison cultivars.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Texas 1015Ye0
Outcome
sugar: pungency ratioe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Dessexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pungency was higher and the sugar: pungency ratio was lower in `Texas 1015Y' and `Sweet Georgia' than in `Dessex', `Rio Bravo', 'Hybrid Yellow Granex', and `Granex 33'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sugar:pungency ratio was lower in Sweet Georgia than in four comparison cultivars.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Sweet Georgiae0
Outcome
sugar: pungency ratioe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Dessexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pungency was higher and the sugar: pungency ratio was lower in `Texas 1015Y' and `Sweet Georgia' than in `Dessex', `Rio Bravo', 'Hybrid Yellow Granex', and `Granex 33'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under low sulfur nutrition, the sugar:pungency ratio may assess market acceptance more precisely than either measure alone.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
market acceptancee0
Qualifier
Under low S nutritione0
Comparator
sugar or pungency assessmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under low S nutrition, market acceptance of “sweet” onion cultivars that vary slightly in nonstructural water-soluble carbohydrates may be assessed more precisely by the sugar: pungency ratio than by sugar or pungency assessments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–833 · show in text ↑