Abstract
Grain filling is a crucial determinant of yield. Thus, a split-plot experiment based on RCB design with three replications was conducted in 2013, in order to evaluate the effects of water supply (I1, I2, I3 and I4: irrigation after 70, 100, 130 and 160 mm evaporation from class A pan, respectively) and hydro-priming duration (P1, P2 and P3: 0, 8 and 16 h, respectively) on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L). The highest grain filling rate was observed for P3, but there was no statistical difference between P1 and P2. Grain filling duration and maximum grain weight decreased with decreasing water availability. Seeds hydro-primed for 16h had the highest maximum grain weight, but there was no significant difference between P2 and P3. Water stress significantly reduced grain yield per unit area, although no significant difference between I1 and I2 treatments was observed. Grain yield per unit area for P3 plants was higher than that of P1 and P2 plants. Grain filling duration and maximum grain weight had the highly positive correlations with grain yield per unit area. Hydro-priming for 16 h had the highest beneficial effects on field performance of mung-bean seeds.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Hydro-priming for 16 h (P3) gave the highest grain filling rate in mung bean.
- Taxon
- mung bean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- P3e1
- Outcome
- grain filling ratee2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Qualifier
- 16 he1
- Comparator
- P1 and P2e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L)”
e1“hydro-priming duration (P1, P2 and P3: 0, 8 and 16 h, respectively)”
e2“The highest grain filling rate was observed for P3”
e3“but there was no statistical difference between P1 and P2”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain filling rate of mung bean did not differ statistically between P2 and P1.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- P2e1
- Outcome
- grain filling ratee2
- Direction
- no statistical differencee3
- Comparator
- P1e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L)”
e1“hydro-priming duration (P1, P2 and P3: 0, 8 and 16 h, respectively)”
e2“The highest grain filling rate was observed for P3”
e3“but there was no statistical difference between P1 and P2”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain filling duration and maximum grain weight of mung bean decreased with decreasing water availability.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- decreasing water availabilitye4
- Outcome
- Grain filling duration and maximum grain weighte4
- Direction
- decreasede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L)”
e4“Grain filling duration and maximum grain weight decreased with decreasing water availability”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeds hydro-primed for 16 h had the highest maximum grain weight in mung bean.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- hydro-primed for 16he5
- Outcome
- maximum grain weighte5
- Direction
- higheste5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L)”
e5“Seeds hydro-primed for 16h had the highest maximum grain weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum grain weight of mung bean did not differ significantly between P3 and P2.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- P3e1
- Outcome
- maximum grain weighte5
- Direction
- no significant differencee6
- Comparator
- P2e6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L)”
e1“hydro-priming duration (P1, P2 and P3: 0, 8 and 16 h, respectively)”
e5“Seeds hydro-primed for 16h had the highest maximum grain weight”
e6“there was no significant difference between P2 and P3”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly reduced grain yield per unit area of mung bean.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Water stresse7
- Outcome
- grain yield per unit areae7
- Direction
- reducede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L)”
e7“Water stress significantly reduced grain yield per unit area”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield per unit area of mung bean did not differ significantly between irrigation I2 and I1.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- I2e3
- Outcome
- grain yield per unit areae1
- Direction
- no significant differencee2
- Comparator
- I1e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L)”
e1“Water stress significantly reduced grain yield per unit area”
e2“although no significant difference between I1 and I2 treatments was observed”
e3“water supply (I1, I2, I3 and I4: irrigation after 70, 100, 130 and 160 mm evaporation from class A pan, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield per unit area of mung bean was higher for P3 plants than for P1 and P2 plants.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- P3e1
- Outcome
- Grain yield per unit areae2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- P1 and P2e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L)”
e1“hydro-priming duration (P1, P2 and P3: 0, 8 and 16 h, respectively)”
e2“Grain yield per unit area for P3 plants was higher than that of P1 and P2 plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain filling duration and maximum grain weight are highly positively correlated with grain yield per unit area of mung bean.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Grain filling duration and maximum grain weighte1
- Outcome
- grain yield per unit areae1
- Direction
- positivee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L)”
e1“Grain filling duration and maximum grain weight had the highly positive correlations with grain yield per unit area”
Claim · model-written summary
Hydro-priming for 16 h had the highest beneficial effects on field performance of mung bean seeds.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Hydro-priming for 16 he1
- Outcome
- field performance of mung-bean seedse1
- Direction
- highest beneficial effectse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on grain filling of mung bean (Vigna radiata L)”
e1“Hydro-priming for 16 h had the highest beneficial effects on field performance of mung-bean seeds”
The same questions in other papers
drought · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →soil water · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.