Paper · 2014 · PubMed

The effect of phosphate bio-fertilizer (Barvar-2) on the growth of marigold.

Fatemeh Zaredost; Davood Hashemabadi; Maryam Barari Ziyabari; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted to study the individual and combined effect of bio-fertilizer (Barvar-2) and chemical phosphate fertilizer on the floral quality of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). A factorial experiment was carried out which consisted of two factors: i) inoculation of seed, root and seed + root with bio-fertilizer (Barvar-2) and control; application of chemical phosphorus at 100 mg I(-1), 200 mg l(-1), 300 mg l(-1) and 400 mg l(-1) levels. In this study, flowering time, display life, fresh and dry weight of flower, available soil phosphorus, shoot phosphorus and carotenoid content were evaluated. Results showed that the combined effect of bio- and chemical fertilizer was insignificant (p < 1 and 5%) for most of the characteristics studied except for shoot phosphorus and carotenoid content in petals. The lowest time to flowering (64.67 days) was obtained in seeds and transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) P. Maximum display life (25.35), fresh weight (16.20 g), carotenoid content (3.903 mg g(-1) d. wt.) and concentration of P in shoots (0.352%) were observed in transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) P.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed and transplant root inoculation with bio-fertilizer combined with 400 mg/L P gave the lowest time to flowering (64.67 days) in marigold.

Taxon
marigolde0
Treatment
seeds and transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) Pe1
Outcome
time to floweringe1
Direction
loweste1
Value
64.67 dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“floral quality of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–192 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest time to flowering (64.67 days) was obtained in seeds and transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplant root inoculation with bio-fertilizer combined with 400 mg/L P gave the maximum display life (25.35) in marigold.

Taxon
marigolde0
Treatment
transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) Pe2
Outcome
display lifee2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
25.35e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“floral quality of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–192 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maximum display life (25.35), fresh weight (16.20 g), carotenoid content (3.903 mg g(-1) d. wt.) and concentration of P in shoots (0.352%) were observed in transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplant root inoculation with bio-fertilizer combined with 400 mg/L P gave the maximum fresh weight (16.20 g) of marigold flowers.

Taxon
marigolde0
Treatment
transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) Pe2
Outcome
fresh weighte2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
16.20 ge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“floral quality of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–192 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maximum display life (25.35), fresh weight (16.20 g), carotenoid content (3.903 mg g(-1) d. wt.) and concentration of P in shoots (0.352%) were observed in transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplant root inoculation with bio-fertilizer combined with 400 mg/L P gave the maximum carotenoid content (3.903 mg/g dry weight) in marigold.

Taxon
marigolde0
Treatment
transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) Pe2
Outcome
carotenoid contente2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
3.903 mg g(-1) d. wt.e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“floral quality of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–192 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maximum display life (25.35), fresh weight (16.20 g), carotenoid content (3.903 mg g(-1) d. wt.) and concentration of P in shoots (0.352%) were observed in transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplant root inoculation with bio-fertilizer combined with 400 mg/L P gave the maximum P concentration in shoots (0.352%) of marigold.

Taxon
marigolde0
Treatment
transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) Pe2
Outcome
concentration of P in shootse2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
0.352%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“floral quality of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–192 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maximum display life (25.35), fresh weight (16.20 g), carotenoid content (3.903 mg g(-1) d. wt.) and concentration of P in shoots (0.352%) were observed in transplant roots inoculation to bio-fertilizer x 400 mg I(-1) P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined bio- and chemical fertilizer effect was not significant for most marigold characteristics studied.

Taxon
marigolde0
Treatment
bio- and chemical fertilizere3
Outcome
most of the characteristics studiede3
Direction
insignificante3
Qualifier
except for shoot phosphorus and carotenoid content in petalse3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“floral quality of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–192 · show in text ↑
e3

“the combined effect of bio- and chemical fertilizer was insignificant (p < 1 and 5%) for most of the characteristics studied except for shoot phosphorus and carotenoid content in petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined bio- and chemical fertilizer effect was significant for shoot phosphorus and carotenoid content in petals of marigold.

Taxon
marigolde0
Treatment
bio- and chemical fertilizere3
Outcome
shoot phosphorus and carotenoid content in petalse3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“floral quality of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–192 · show in text ↑
e3

“the combined effect of bio- and chemical fertilizer was insignificant (p < 1 and 5%) for most of the characteristics studied except for shoot phosphorus and carotenoid content in petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–823 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Tagetes (marigolds)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

transplanting · growth · Tagetes (marigolds)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · growth · Tagetes (marigolds)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.