Paper · 2011

Consequences of a Regional Nuclear Conflict for Crop Production in the Midwestern United States

Alan Robock; Christopher J. Kucharik

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop production would decline in the Midwestern U.S. from climate change following a regional nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan. Using Agro-IBIS, a dynamic crop growth model, we simulated the response of maize and soybeans to cooler, drier, darker conditions from war-related smoke. We combined observed climate conditions for Iowa, Illinois, Indiana and Missouri with output from a general circulation simulation that injected 5 Tg of elemental carbon into the upper troposphere. Both maize and soybeans show notable reductions for a decade after the event. Maize yields would decline 10-40 percent while soybeans would drop 2-20 percent. Temporal variation in magnitude of yield for both crops generally follows the variation in climatic anomalies; greatest decline is in the five years following the 5 Tg event, then gradually levels out. Yield decline for both crops appears linked to changes in growing period duration and, less markedly, to reduced precipitation and altered maximum daily temperature during growth. Seasonal average of daily maximum temperature difference between the control and nuclear scenarios has a quadratic relationship to yield differences; extreme changes create increased yield loss, but mean changes are neutral.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated maize yields in the Midwestern U.S. would decline by 10-40 percent after a regional nuclear conflict.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
declinee0
Value
10-40 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yields would decline 10-40 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–609 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated soybean yields would drop by 2-20 percent after the regional nuclear conflict.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
drope0
Value
2-20 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yields would decline 10-40 percent while soybeans would drop 2-20 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–648 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Both maize and soybeans show notable simulated yield reductions for a decade after the event.

Taxon
maize and soybeansGlycine maxZea mayse0
Outcome
notable reductionse0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
for a decade after the evente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both maize and soybeans show notable reductions for a decade after the event”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–567 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The simulated yield decline is greatest in the five years following the 5 Tg event and then gradually levels out.

Outcome
greatest declinee0
Qualifier
then gradually levels oute0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“greatest decline is in the five years following the 5 Tg event, then gradually levels out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–850 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decline for both crops appears linked to changes in growing period duration and, less markedly, to reduced precipitation and altered maximum daily temperature during growth.

Taxon
both cropse0
Treatment
changes in growing period duratione0
Outcome
Yield declinee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Yield decline for both crops appears linked to changes in growing period duration and, less markedly, to reduced precipitation and altered maximum daily temperature during growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1030 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The seasonal average difference in daily maximum temperature between the control and nuclear scenarios has a quadratic relationship to yield differences.

Treatment
daily maximum temperature differencee0
Outcome
yield differencese0
Qualifier
quadratic relationshipe0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Seasonal average of daily maximum temperature difference between the control and nuclear scenarios has a quadratic relationship to yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Extreme temperature changes create increased yield loss, but mean changes are neutral.

Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
mean changes are neutrale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“extreme changes create increased yield loss, but mean changes are neutral”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1255 · show in text ↑