Paper · 2014 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Dryland soil water storage susceptibility to different soil tillage practices under Vetch- Wheat crop rotation

Jallil Asghari Meydani; Mehdi Rahmati; Esmaeil Karimi; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Crop rotation and soil tillage are two practices which would result in better use of water resources. So in order to investigate the effects of different crop rotation and soil tillage practices on soil water storage, a multi-annual experiment employing two crop rotations and six tillage practices was carried out in dry-land condition of Maragheh, northwest of Iran during year 2007 till 2011. Results showed that autumn cultivation of the common vetch (CR1) compared to spring cultivation of the common vetch (CR2) left more water in the soil for the following wheat cropping in the next years and subsequently increased biological and grain yield of wheat. It was also notified that the increase of water storage in second sampling depth (15-30 cm) was significantly more than two other depths (0-15 and 30-45 cm). Results also depicted that the tillage practice applying "chisel plough + cyclo-tiller + seed drill (TP1)" compared to other practices and especially the routine tillage of the region moldboard plow + disk harrow + manual seed broadcasting, TP5) significantly increased soil water storage. The mentioned tillage practice (TP1) markedly decreased the bulk density of soil and increased biological and grain yield of wheat, as well. Therefore, applying TP1 tillage practice beside autumn cultivation of common vetch in rotation with wheat would be a good strategy to increase soil water storage and crop yield in dry-land conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn vetch cultivation left more soil water for subsequent wheat than spring cultivation.

Treatment
autumn cultivation of the common vetch (CR1)e0
Outcome
water in the soile0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
spring cultivation of the common vetch (CR2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“autumn cultivation of the common vetch (CR1) compared to spring cultivation of the common vetch (CR2) left more water in the soil for the following wheat cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn vetch cultivation increased wheat biological yield.

Treatment
autumn cultivation of the common vetch (CR1)e0
Outcome
biologicale0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
spring cultivation of the common vetch (CR2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“autumn cultivation of the common vetch (CR1) compared to spring cultivation of the common vetch (CR2) left more water in the soil for the following wheat cropping in the next years and subsequently increased biological and grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn vetch cultivation increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
autumn cultivation of the common vetch (CR1)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
spring cultivation of the common vetch (CR2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“autumn cultivation of the common vetch (CR1) compared to spring cultivation of the common vetch (CR2) left more water in the soil for the following wheat cropping in the next years and subsequently increased biological and grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–660 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water storage rose more at 15-30 cm than at two other depths.

Outcome
water storagee0
Direction
significantly moree0
Qualifier
15-30 cme0
Comparator
two other depths (0-15 and 30-45 cm)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of water storage in second sampling depth (15-30 cm) was significantly more than two other depths (0-15 and 30-45 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TP1 tillage significantly increased soil water storage over other practices.

Treatment
chisel plough + cyclo-tiller + seed drill (TP1)e0
Outcome
soil water storagee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tillage practice applying "chisel plough + cyclo-tiller + seed drill (TP1)" compared to other practices and especially the routine tillage of the region moldboard plow + disk harrow + manual seed broadcasting, TP5) significantly increased soil water storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TP1 markedly decreased soil bulk density.

Treatment
TP1e0
Outcome
bulk density of soile0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mentioned tillage practice (TP1) markedly decreased the bulk density of soil and increased biological and grain yield of wheat, as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TP1 increased wheat biological yield.

Treatment
TP1e0
Outcome
biologicale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mentioned tillage practice (TP1) markedly decreased the bulk density of soil and increased biological and grain yield of wheat, as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TP1 increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
TP1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mentioned tillage practice (TP1) markedly decreased the bulk density of soil and increased biological and grain yield of wheat, as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1249 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend TP1 with autumn vetch rotation to improve water storage and crop yield.

Treatment
applying TP1 tillage practice beside autumn cultivation of common vetche0
Outcome
increase soil water storage and crop yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying TP1 tillage practice beside autumn cultivation of common vetch in rotation with wheat would be a good strategy to increase soil water storage and crop yield in dry-land conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1450 · show in text ↑

Vicia sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transplanting · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Water seed drill raised soil moisture from 13% to 24%.

    Performance Evaluation of a Water Seed Drill · 2018 · compared with existing 13% soil moisture content

    Same direction

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.