Paper · 2013 · Research Journal of Agricultural Science

SPECTRAL IMAGING IN THE EVALUATION OF THE CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT IN WHEAT

F. Sala; Marius Boldea; I. Gergen

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of our research was to evaluate the nutritional status expressed through the chlorophyll content in wheat crops, by using the analysis of the digital images taken in the visible spectrum. The study is based on observations of different colors expressed by plants in the visible spectrum, following a different nutritional status. These data about colors were associated and correlated with the chlorophyll content. The biologic material was represented by Alex variety of wheat (Triticum aestivum ssp. Vulgare). The nutritional stress which generated the variation in the chlorophyll content was induced by controlled nitrogen fertilization, in doses between 0 - 200 kg active substance ha -1 with four levels of PK 0 - 150 kg active substance ha -1 . Chlorophyll content of wheat plants was determined with a portable chlorophyll meter (Konica Minolta SPAD 502 Plus) to measure absorbance leaves red and near infrared region. Determination of chlorophyll was done in the same time to capture digital images. Capturing digital images made with a Nikon D80 at uniform parameters for all variants. The digital images, captured in the visible spectrum, were analyzed from the point of view of their color spectrum by nonlinear perceptual representation systems RGB, HSB and HSL. Chlorophyll content ranged from 40.26 ± 1.36 (SPAD units) from control variant (P0K0N0) and 55.57 ± 0.55 (SPAD units) at P150K150N200 variant. After the correlative analysis of the numerical values resulted on color channels (H,S,B and H,S,L) and chlorophyll, we obtained correlations with high significance level (very significantly negative correlation between the chlorophyll content and color channel BHSB, r = -0.930). Multi-parameter analysis of the variables, accomplished through cluster analysis and data grouping based on Euclidean distances, places the experimental variants according to the fertilization level. Their disposition is also correlated with the chlorophyll content and HSB and HSL values resulted from tests carried out and from the data stored in digital images.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat chlorophyll content ranged from 40.26 SPAD in control to 55.57 SPAD under fertilization.

Treatment
P150K150N200e0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contente0
Value
55.57 ± 0.55 (SPAD units)e0
Qualifier
40.26 ± 1.36 (SPAD units)e0
Comparator
control variant (P0K0N0)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll content ranged from 40.26 ± 1.36 (SPAD units) from control variant (P0K0N0) and 55.57 ± 0.55 (SPAD units) at P150K150N200 variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1431 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content and BHSB color channel were very significantly negatively correlated.

Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r = -0.930e0
Comparator
color channel BHSBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“very significantly negative correlation between the chlorophyll content and color channel BHSB, r = -0.930”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1711 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis placed experimental variants according to fertilization level.

Outcome
places the experimental variants according to the fertilization levele0
Comparator
fertilization levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cluster analysis and data grouping based on Euclidean distances, places the experimental variants according to the fertilization level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1912 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variant placement was correlated with chlorophyll and HSB and HSL values.

Outcome
dispositione0
Comparator
chlorophyll content and HSB and HSL valuese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Their disposition is also correlated with the chlorophyll content and HSB and HSL values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2002 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑