Paper · 2014

Evaluation of physiological parameters as a screening technique for drought tolerance in bread wheat

Ezatollah Farshadfar; Meysam Ghasemi; Fariba Rafii

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the present study, we evaluated the ability of yield based and physiological parameters for identification of drought tolerant bread wheat genotypes. The experiment was conducted in a randomized completely block design (RCBD) with three replications under two different rainfed and irrigated conditions. The results of analysis of variance exhibited significant differences between the genotypes for grain yield (GY), cell membrane stability (CMS), proline concentration (PC), relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll fluorescence (CHF), stomatal conductance (SC), relative chlorophyll content (RCC) , excised leaf water retention (ELWR) and relative water loss (RWL) indicating the presence of genetic variation and possible screening of drought tolerant genotypes. Significant correlation was found between multiple selection index (MSI) and stress tolerance index (STI). Screening drought tolerant genotypes by physiological indicators of drought tolerance using mean rank, standard deviation of ranks and biplot analysis, discriminated genotypes (18), (15), (10), (5) and (2) as the most drought tolerant. Therefore they are recommended to be used as parents for genetic analysis, gene mapping and improvement of drought tolerance in common wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly in grain yield and eight physiological traits.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
grain yield (GY), cell membrane stability (CMS), proline concentration (PC)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences between the genotypes for grain yield (GY), cell membrane stability (CMS), proline concentration (PC), relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll fluorescence (CHF), stomatal conductance (SC), relative chlorophyll content (RCC) , excised leaf water retention (ELWR) and relative water loss (RWL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple selection index correlated significantly with stress tolerance index.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
multiple selection index (MSI)e0
Comparator
stress tolerance index (STI)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant correlation was found between multiple selection index (MSI) and stress tolerance index (STI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological screening identified genotypes 18, 15, 10, 5 and 2 as most drought tolerant.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
most drought tolerante0
Value
genotypes (18), (15), (10), (5) and (2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Screening drought tolerant genotypes by physiological indicators of drought tolerance using mean rank, standard deviation of ranks and biplot analysis, discriminated genotypes (18), (15), (10), (5) and (2) as the most drought tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–100 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend the identified genotypes as parents for wheat drought tolerance improvement and genetic analysis.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
parents for genetic analysis, gene mapping and improvement of drought tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they are recommended to be used as parents for genetic analysis, gene mapping and improvement of drought tolerance in common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1254 · show in text ↑