Paper · 2015

RESPONSE OF CUCUMBERS TO DIFFERENT IRRIGATION REGIMES APPLIED THROUGH DRIP-IRRIGATION SYSTEM

Üstün Şahin; Yasemin Kuşlu; Fatih Mehmet Kızıloğlu

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the future, irrigated crop production will be affected significantly with water scarcity . There is a pressing need to improve the irrigation water efficiency under insufficient water supply conditions. Therefore, the effects of different irrigation quantities on the fruit yield, yield components (fruit length, diameter, weight and number), irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) andfruit quality (minerals,phenolic content and antioxidant activity) ofdrip-irrigated cucumberwere evaluated in open field conditions. Different irrigation levels were adjusted usingthree different ratios(T1: 1.0, T2: 0.85 and T3: 0.70)of cumulative evaporation from a Class A pan.The maximumtotal fruit yield, early fruit yield, fruit length, fruit number per plant were determined fromT1 irrigation level(64.13 Mg ha -1 , 2.76 Mg ha -1 , 15.95 cm and 19.94), respectively.Significant positive linear relations were obtained between total fruit yield , fruit length and fruit number with irrigation quantity.The highest IWUE was obtained fromT2 irrigation level(134.94 kg ha -1 mm -1 ), however, there wasno significant difference among the treatments.The mineral content (N, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn and Zn) and total antioxidant activity in cucumber fruits was higher in T2 irrigation level compared with the T1 irrigation level, the T1 irrigation level provided statistically higher total phenolic, Cu and B content compared withT2 and T3.In conclusion, the T1 treatment is recommended in semi-arid areas with acool climate for obtaining higher fruit yield. However, the T2 treatment is also recommended for obtaining higher IWUE and fruit quality if water is scarce.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum total fruit yield of drip-irrigated cucumber, 64.13 Mg ha-1, was obtained at the T1 irrigation level.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T1 irrigation levele1
Outcome
total fruit yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
64.13 Mg ha -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximumtotal fruit yield, early fruit yield, fruit length, fruit number per plant were determined fromT1 irrigation level(64.13 Mg ha -1 , 2.76 Mg ha -1 , 15.95 cm and 19.94)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBERS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum early fruit yield of cucumber, 2.76 Mg ha-1, was obtained at the T1 irrigation level.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T1 irrigation levele1
Outcome
early fruit yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
2.76 Mg ha -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximumtotal fruit yield, early fruit yield, fruit length, fruit number per plant were determined fromT1 irrigation level(64.13 Mg ha -1 , 2.76 Mg ha -1 , 15.95 cm and 19.94)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBERS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum fruit length of cucumber, 15.95 cm, was obtained at the T1 irrigation level.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T1 irrigation levele1
Outcome
fruit lengthe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
15.95 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximumtotal fruit yield, early fruit yield, fruit length, fruit number per plant were determined fromT1 irrigation level(64.13 Mg ha -1 , 2.76 Mg ha -1 , 15.95 cm and 19.94)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBERS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum fruit number per plant of cucumber, 19.94, was obtained at the T1 irrigation level.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T1 irrigation levele1
Outcome
fruit number per plante1
Direction
maximume1
Value
19.94e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximumtotal fruit yield, early fruit yield, fruit length, fruit number per plant were determined fromT1 irrigation level(64.13 Mg ha -1 , 2.76 Mg ha -1 , 15.95 cm and 19.94)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBERS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fruit yield, fruit length and fruit number of cucumber showed significant positive linear relations with irrigation quantity.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
irrigation quantitye1
Outcome
total fruit yield , fruit length and fruit numbere1
Direction
positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Significant positive linear relations were obtained between total fruit yield , fruit length and fruit number with irrigation quantity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBERS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest irrigation water use efficiency of cucumber, 134.94 kg ha-1 mm-1, was obtained at the T2 irrigation level.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T2 irrigation levele1
Outcome
IWUEe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
134.94 kg ha -1 mm -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest IWUE was obtained fromT2 irrigation level(134.94 kg ha -1 mm -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBERS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no significant difference in irrigation water use efficiency among the irrigation treatments.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
irrigation levele1
Outcome
IWUEe1
Direction
no significant differencee1
Comparator
the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest IWUE was obtained fromT2 irrigation level(134.94 kg ha -1 mm -1 ), however, there wasno significant difference among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBERS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral content (N, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn, Zn) and total antioxidant activity of cucumber fruits were higher at the T2 irrigation level than at T1.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
T2 irrigation levele1
Outcome
mineral content (N, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn and Zn) and total antioxidant activitye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
T1 irrigation levele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The mineral content (N, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn and Zn) and total antioxidant activity in cucumber fruits was higher in T2 irrigation level compared with the T1 irrigation level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T1 irrigation level gave statistically higher total phenolic, Cu and B content in cucumber fruits than T2 and T3.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T1 irrigation levele1
Outcome
total phenolic, Cu and B contente1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
T2 and T3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the T1 irrigation level provided statistically higher total phenolic, Cu and B content compared withT2 and T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBERS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The T1 irrigation treatment is recommended for cucumber in semi-arid areas with a cool climate to obtain higher fruit yield.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T1 treatmente1
Outcome
higher fruit yielde1
Setting
semi-arid areas with acool climatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the T1 treatment is recommended in semi-arid areas with acool climate for obtaining higher fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBERS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The T2 irrigation treatment is also recommended for cucumber to obtain higher irrigation water use efficiency and fruit quality when water is scarce.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T2 treatmente1
Outcome
higher IWUE and fruit qualitye1
Qualifier
if water is scarcee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the T2 treatment is also recommended for obtaining higher IWUE and fruit quality if water is scarce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBERS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.