Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the nodulation and productivity of lineages of the bean group Carioca inoculated with Rhizobium tropici or fertilized with nitrogen. The experiments were conducted in Dourados, MS, Brazil, in 2008 (experiment 1) and 2009 (experiment 2). The experiment was performed in randomized blocks in triplicate in a 2 x 14 factorial, in which the factors were two different forms of nitrogen supply (mineral N or rhizobia inoculation). We used 14 different bean lineages. The seeds were inoculated with a mixture of the R. tropici strains CIAT 899 (SEMIA 4077) and PRF 81 (SEMIA 4080). For the majority of the new strains tested, the grain productivity of the common bean were similar for plants inoculated with R. tropici and those fertilized with 80 kg N ha -1 . The different nodulation and phytotechnical parameter behaviors of some strains demonstrated that the source of N (inoculation of Rhizobium or nitrogen fertilization) in studies on breeding for the selection of bean cultivars can directly affect their yield potential.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Grain productivity of common bean lineages was similar for plants inoculated with Rhizobium tropici and those fertilized with 80 kg N ha-1 for the majority of new strains.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarise2 - Treatment
- inoculated with R. tropicie2
- Interactor
- Rhizobium tropici
Martinezella tropicie0symbiont - Outcome
- grain productivitye2
- Direction
- similare2
- Qualifier
- For the majority of the new strains testede2
- Comparator
- fertilized with 80 kg N ha -1e2
- Setting
- Dourados, MS, Brazile1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The aim of this study was to evaluate the nodulation and productivity of lineages of the bean group Carioca inoculated with Rhizobium tropici or fertilized with nitrogen”
e1“The experiments were conducted in Dourados, MS, Brazil, in 2008 (experiment 1) and 2009 (experiment 2)”
e2“For the majority of the new strains tested, the grain productivity of the common bean were similar for plants inoculated with R. tropici and those fertilized with 80 kg N ha -1”
Claim · model-written summary
Nodulation and phytotechnical parameter behaviours differed among bean strains.
- Taxon
- bean cultivarse3
- Outcome
- nodulation and phytotechnical parameter behaviorse3
- Qualifier
- of some strainse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The different nodulation and phytotechnical parameter behaviors of some strains demonstrated that the source of N (inoculation of Rhizobium or nitrogen fertilization) in studies on breeding for the selection of bean cultivars can directly affect their yield potential”
Claim · model-written summary
The source of nitrogen, either Rhizobium inoculation or nitrogen fertilization, can directly affect yield potential of bean cultivars.
- Taxon
- bean cultivarse3
- Treatment
- inoculation of Rhizobium or nitrogen fertilizatione3
- Outcome
- yield potentiale3
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e3“The different nodulation and phytotechnical parameter behaviors of some strains demonstrated that the source of N (inoculation of Rhizobium or nitrogen fertilization) in studies on breeding for the selection of bean cultivars can directly affect their yield potential”
The same questions in other papers
Martinezella tropici · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 153 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.