Paper · 2000 · Weed Technology

Optimizing Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control with ICIA 06041

F. CRAIG STEVENSON; F. A. HOLM; KEN J. KIRKLAND

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wild oat (Avena fatua) control often is an integral management practice in cropping systems that include cereal crops. Experiments were conducted at two locations in Saskatchewan (Saskatoon and Scott), Canada, from 1994 to 1997 to determine the influence of ICIA 0604 rate (50, 100, 150, and 200 g ai/ha), water volume (30, 50, and 100 L/ha), spray mixture pH (unbuffered, close to pH 7.0; reduced, pH 4.0), late morning and evening application times, and sodium bicarbonate concentration of water source (Saskatoon water, negligible; Scott water, 695 mg/L) on wild oat fresh weight and wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield. Reducing ICIA 0604 rate below the recommended label rate (200 g/ha) increased wild oat fresh weight by 22% and decreased wheat grain yield by 7% when applied with 50 or 100 L/ha of water. Applications with 30 L/ha of water resulted in more wild oat growth (19%) and less wheat yield (6%), regardless of the ICIA 0604 rates. Spray mixture pH or time of application did not modify the effects of ICIA 0604 rate and water volume on wild oat fresh weight and wheat yield at Saskatoon. At Scott, the negative effects of ICIA 0604 rates lower than 200 g/ha applied with 50 or 100 L/ha of water were most apparent when applications were made in the morning, especially with an unbuffered spray mixture. ICIA 0604 applications made in the evening with 50 or 100 L/ha of water resulted in the lowest wild oat fresh weights and greatest wheat yields, regardless of the ICIA 0604 rate or spray mixture pH. Antagonism between sodium bicarbonate in the unbuffered water from Scott, as indicated by the spray mixture pH effect, and the time of application effect were important factors controlling treatment responses at Scott. Lower than recommended ICIA 0604 rates often maintained net returns, even though wheat yield responded negatively to reduced ICIA 0604 rates. Understanding the effects of water quality on wild oat control will allow producers to make prudent decisions regarding the optimal application parameters for ICIA 0604.Nomenclature: ICIA 0604 (proposed common name, tralkoxydim), 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)propyl]-3-hydroxy-5-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)cyclohex-2-enone; wild oat, Avena fatua L. #3 AVEFA; hard red spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Additional index words: Water volume, spray mixture pH, time of application, weed interference, AVEFA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing ICIA 0604 below 200 g/ha increased wild oat fresh weight by 22% with 50 or 100 L/ha water.

Taxon
wild oate0
Treatment
Reducing ICIA 0604 rate below the recommended label rate (200 g/ha)e0
Outcome
wild oat fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%e0
Qualifier
50 or 100 L/ha of watere0
Comparator
recommended label rate (200 g/ha)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing ICIA 0604 rate below the recommended label rate (200 g/ha) increased wild oat fresh weight by 22% and decreased wheat grain yield by 7% when applied with 50 or 100 L/ha of water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing ICIA 0604 below 200 g/ha decreased wheat grain yield by 7% with 50 or 100 L/ha water.

Treatment
Reducing ICIA 0604 rate below the recommended label rate (200 g/ha)e0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
7%e0
Qualifier
50 or 100 L/ha of watere0
Comparator
recommended label rate (200 g/ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing ICIA 0604 rate below the recommended label rate (200 g/ha) increased wild oat fresh weight by 22% and decreased wheat grain yield by 7% when applied with 50 or 100 L/ha of water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying with 30 L/ha water increased wild oat growth by 19%.

Taxon
wild oate0
Treatment
30 L/ha of watere0
Outcome
wild oat growthe0
Direction
moree0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
50, and 100 L/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“Applications with 30 L/ha of water resulted in more wild oat growth (19%) and less wheat yield (6%), regardless of the ICIA 0604 rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“water volume (30, 50, and 100 L/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying with 30 L/ha water lowered wheat yield by 6%.

Treatment
30 L/ha of watere0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
50, and 100 L/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications with 30 L/ha of water resulted in more wild oat growth (19%) and less wheat yield (6%), regardless of the ICIA 0604 rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“water volume (30, 50, and 100 L/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–341 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Saskatoon, spray pH and application time did not modify herbicide rate and water volume effects on wild oat fresh weight.

Taxon
wild oate0
Outcome
wild oat fresh weighte0
Direction
did not modifye0
Setting
Saskatoone0

Verbatim

e0

“Spray mixture pH or time of application did not modify the effects of ICIA 0604 rate and water volume on wild oat fresh weight and wheat yield at Saskatoon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Saskatoon, spray pH and application time did not modify herbicide rate and water volume effects on wheat yield.

Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
did not modifye0
Setting
Saskatoone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spray mixture pH or time of application did not modify the effects of ICIA 0604 rate and water volume on wild oat fresh weight and wheat yield at Saskatoon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Scott, morning application, particularly unbuffered spray, accentuated negative effects of rates below 200 g/ha.

Treatment
in the morninge0
Outcome
negative effectse0
Direction
most apparente0
Qualifier
unbuffered spray mixturee0
Setting
Scotte0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At Scott, the negative effects of ICIA 0604 rates lower than 200 g/ha applied with 50 or 100 L/ha of water were most apparent when applications were made in the morning, especially with an unbuffered spray mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Evening application with 50 or 100 L/ha water gave the lowest wild oat fresh weights.

Taxon
wild oate0
Treatment
ICIA 0604 applications made in the evening with 50 or 100 L/ha of watere0
Outcome
wild oat fresh weightse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ICIA 0604 applications made in the evening with 50 or 100 L/ha of water resulted in the lowest wild oat fresh weights and greatest wheat yields, regardless of the ICIA 0604 rate or spray mixture pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Evening application with 50 or 100 L/ha water gave the greatest wheat yields.

Treatment
ICIA 0604 applications made in the evening with 50 or 100 L/ha of watere0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ICIA 0604 applications made in the evening with 50 or 100 L/ha of water resulted in the lowest wild oat fresh weights and greatest wheat yields, regardless of the ICIA 0604 rate or spray mixture pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1520 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced ICIA 0604 rates often maintained net returns.

Treatment
Lower than recommended ICIA 0604 ratese0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maintainede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower than recommended ICIA 0604 rates often maintained net returns, even though wheat yield responded negatively to reduced ICIA 0604 rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1881 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–624 · show in text ↑

label · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.