Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sorghum plus sunflower extracts combined with one quarter of label herbicide rates inhibited wild oat dry matter production by up to 89% in wheat.

A claim from A 75% reduction in herbicide use through integration with sorghum + sunflower extracts for weed management in wheat · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum plus sunflower extracts combined with one quarter of label herbicide rates inhibited wild oat dry matter production by up to 89% in wheat.

Treatment
sorghum + sunflower extracts combined with 1/4(th) (75% less) of label rates of herbicidese0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
dry matter production of wild oate0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
89%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum + sunflower extracts combined with 1/4(th) (75% less) of label rates of herbicides inhibited dry matter production of wild oat by up to 89% and canary grass by up to 92%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–589
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115

Title

A 75% reduction in herbicide use through integration with sorghum + sunflower extracts for weed management in wheat

Muhammad Naeem Mushtaq; Zahid Ata Cheema; Abdul Khaliq; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2010. doi:10.1002/jsfa.4030

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-30b032d3a7e4fae55499b33a5148068ffc8de4ddc08a0948d2c14a8b49531478 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

label · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Sorghum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 36 positive, 9 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

botanical · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

140 papers: 123 positive, 17 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

131 papers more in this group

See all 140 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.