Paper · 2015 · Global Journal of Agricultural Innovation Research & Development

Integrated Weed Management in Wheat under Subtropical Rain-Fed Conditions

Muhammad Jamal Khan; Muhammad Azim Malik; Muhammad Ansar; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out from July, 2013 to May, 2014 at University Research Farm Chakwal Road, of Pir Mehr Ali Shah-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi to evaluate the integrated weed control management strategies followed by summer green manure practices on weeds and grain yield of wheat under rain-fed conditions. The experiment was laid out in a 2-factor factorial Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in strip plot arrangement with three replications of each treatment. The sorghum and sesbania crops were sown in the first week of July, 2013 and incorporated into soil as green manure at the end of August, 2013 after attaining sufficient biomass. The wheat variety "Chakwal-50" was sown with a tractor drawn rabi drill in the last week of October, 2013 with a seeding rate of 125kg ha-1. The herbicides used were buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 and isoproturon @ 1.00kg a.i. ha-1. The weeds found in the wheat crop were Fumaria indica L., Convolvulus arvensis L., Chenonpodium album L., Asphodelus tenuifolius L. The incorporation of sorghum green manuring resulted in good control to suppress the weed population and biomass. The buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 along with tharphali significantly reduced the weed density (18.8 m-2), weed biomass (12.7g m-2) and increased weed control efficiency (71.1%) followed by isoproturon applied @ 1.00kg a.i. ha-1. The highest grains yield of 3208.5kg ha-1 was recorded in the plots where weeds were controlled with buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 followed by tharphali where sorghum green manure was incorporated in summer followed by the isoproturon application @ 1.00kg a.i. ha-1(3016.1kg ha-1) in combination with tharphali in the same green manuring crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum green manure suppressed weed population and biomass.

Treatment
incorporation of sorghum green manuringe0
Outcome
weed population and biomasse0
Direction
suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incorporation of sorghum green manuring resulted in good control to suppress the weed population and biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Buctril super with tharphali significantly reduced weed density to 18.8 m-2.

Treatment
buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 along with tharphalie0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
18.8 m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 along with tharphali significantly reduced the weed density (18.8 m-2), weed biomass (12.7g m-2) and increased weed control efficiency (71.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Buctril super with tharphali significantly reduced weed biomass to 12.7g m-2.

Treatment
buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 along with tharphalie0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
12.7g m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 along with tharphali significantly reduced the weed density (18.8 m-2), weed biomass (12.7g m-2) and increased weed control efficiency (71.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buctril super with tharphali raised weed control efficiency to 71.1%.

Treatment
buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 along with tharphalie0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
71.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 along with tharphali significantly reduced the weed density (18.8 m-2), weed biomass (12.7g m-2) and increased weed control efficiency (71.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buctril super with tharphali and summer sorghum green manure gave the highest wheat grain yield, 3208.5kg ha-1.

Treatment
buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 followed by tharphali where sorghum green manure was incorporated in summere0
Outcome
grains yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3208.5kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grains yield of 3208.5kg ha-1 was recorded in the plots where weeds were controlled with buctril super @ 750ml ha-1 followed by tharphali where sorghum green manure was incorporated in summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon with tharphali and the same green manure gave wheat grain yield of 3016.1kg ha-1.

Treatment
isoproturon application @ 1.00kg a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
grains yielde1
Value
3016.1kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoproturon application @ 1.00kg a.i. ha-1(3016.1kg ha-1) in combination with tharphali in the same green manuring crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1712 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest grains yield of 3208.5kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Sorghum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 36 positive, 9 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Sorghum · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

85 papers: 49 positive, 36 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.