Paper · 2011 · Weed Research

Tillage effects on weed communities in an organic winter wheat–sunflower–spelt cropping sequence

F X SANS; A BERNER; L ARMENGOT; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
76
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

S ans FX, B erner A, A rmengot L & M äder P (2011). Tillage effects on weed communities in an organic winter wheat–sunflower–spelt cropping sequence. Weed Research 51 , 413–421. Summary Conservation tillage could provide environmental benefits to organic farming. However, potential weed problems often tend to discourage farmers from adopting it. The effects of tillage (reduced vs. conventional), fertilisation (slurry vs. manure compost) and the application of biodynamic preparations (with and without) on crop yield and on weed cover, diversity and biological attributes were investigated in a cropping sequence of wheat, sunflower and spelt. Total weed cover and perennial cover in reduced tillage treatments were two to three times greater than in conventional treatments. Monocotyledon cover in reduced tillage was three times that in conventional tillage in spelt, whereas the dicotyledon Stellaria media dominated in sunflower. Weed diversity was similar across treatments, regardless of cereal crop, whereas lower diversity values were observed with reduced tillage in sunflower, because of the dominance of S. media . There was virtually no effect of fertilisation and biodynamic preparations on weed parameters. Although wheat and spelt yield decreased in reduced tillage plots (14% and 8% respectively), the sunflower grain yield was unaffected. Reduced tillage could thus be useful in organic cropping systems but would require proper management of perennial and monocotyledonous weeds, which are often problematic for annual crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total weed cover and perennial weed cover in reduced tillage were two to three times those in conventional tillage.

Treatment
reduced tillage treatmentse1
Outcome
Total weed cover and perennial covere1
Direction
greatere1
Value
two to three timese1
Comparator
conventional treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were investigated in a cropping sequence of wheat, sunflower and spelt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total weed cover and perennial cover in reduced tillage treatments were two to three times greater than in conventional treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocotyledon cover in reduced tillage was about three times that in conventional tillage in spelt.

Treatment
reduced tillagee2
Outcome
Monocotyledon covere2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
three timese2
Comparator
conventional tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Monocotyledon cover in reduced tillage was three times that in conventional tillage in spelt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–872 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dicotyledon Stellaria media dominated the weeds in sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse3
Interactor
Stellaria mediaStellaria mediae3weed
Outcome
dominatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Stellaria media
Stellaria media · Interactorfr:Utilisateur:Jeantosti · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“whereas the dicotyledon Stellaria media dominated in sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed diversity values were lower with reduced tillage in sunflower, because of S. media dominance.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse4
Treatment
reduced tillagee4
Interactor
S. mediaStellaria mediae4weed
Outcome
diversity valuese4
Direction
lowere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Stellaria media
Stellaria media · Interactorfr:Utilisateur:Jeantosti · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“lower diversity values were observed with reduced tillage in sunflower, because of the dominance of S. media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed diversity was similar across treatments regardless of cereal crop.

Taxon
cereal crope5
Outcome
Weed diversitye5
Qualifier
across treatmentse5

Verbatim

e5

“Weed diversity was similar across treatments, regardless of cereal crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilisation and biodynamic preparations had virtually no effect on weed parameters.

Treatment
fertilisation and biodynamic preparationse6
Outcome
weed parameterse6
Direction
no effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“There was virtually no effect of fertilisation and biodynamic preparations on weed parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1223 · show in text ↑
e0

“were investigated in a cropping sequence of wheat, sunflower and spelt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage decreased wheat yield by 14%.

Treatment
reduced tillage plotse7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
14%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Although wheat and spelt yield decreased in reduced tillage plots (14% and 8% respectively), the sunflower grain yield was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage decreased spelt yield by 8%.

Treatment
reduced tillage plotse7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
8%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Although wheat and spelt yield decreased in reduced tillage plots (14% and 8% respectively), the sunflower grain yield was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage did not affect sunflower grain yield.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse7
Treatment
reduced tillage plotse7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
unaffectede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Although wheat and spelt yield decreased in reduced tillage plots (14% and 8% respectively), the sunflower grain yield was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1358 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage could be useful in organic cropping if perennial and monocotyledonous weeds are managed.

Outcome
management of perennial and monocotyledonous weedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Reduced tillage could thus be useful in organic cropping systems but would require proper management of perennial and monocotyledonous weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1500 · show in text ↑
e0

“were investigated in a cropping sequence of wheat, sunflower and spelt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–646 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

85 papers: 49 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum spelta (spelt)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 50 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.