Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Ecology

Effect of fertilization patterns on the assemblage of weed communities in an upland winter wheat field

L. Tang; K. Wan; C. Cheng; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
55
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Understanding the response of farmland weed community assembly to fertilization is important for designing better nutrient management strategies in integrated farmland ecological systems. Many studies have focused on weed characteristics, mainly crop–weed competition responses to fertilization or weed communities alone. However, weed community assembly in association with crop growth is poorly understood in the agroecosystems, but is important for the determination of integrated weed management. Biodiversity promotes ecosystem productivity in the grassland, but whether it applies to the agroecosystems is unclear. Based on an 11-year field experiment, the cumulative effects of different fertilization patterns on the floristic composition and species diversity of farmland weed communities along with wheat growth in a winter wheat–soybean rotation were investigated. The field trial included five fertilization patterns with different combinations of N, P and K fertilizers. Species composition and diversity of weed communities, aboveground plant biomass and nutrient accumulation of weeds and winter wheat, light penetration to the ground surface and wheat yield were measured at each plot in 2009 and 2010. Multivariate analysis, regression and analysis of variance were used to analyze the responses of these parameters to the different fertilization treatments. Four dominant weeds (Galium aparine L., Veronica persica Poir., Vicia sativa L. and Geranium carolinianum L.) accounted for ~90% of the total weed density in the 2 years of experimental duration. The residual weed community assembly was influenced primarily by topsoil available nutrients in the order P > N > K. Competition for nutrients and solar radiation between crops and weeds was the main indirect effect of fertilization on the changes in weed community composition and species diversity. The indices of species diversity (species richness, Shannon–Wiener, Pielou and Simpson indices) showed significant linear relationships with wheat yield. The balanced fertilization treatment was more efficient at inhibiting the potential growth of weeds because of solar radiation being intercepted by wheat. These results support the conclusion that wheat yield is favored by balanced fertilization, whereas the weed community is favored by PK fertilization in terms of density and diversity. However, the negative effects on wheat yield may be compromised by simultaneous positive effects of weed communities in the fertilization treatments, for instance, the NP and NK treatments, which are intermediate in terms of increasing wheat production and to a level maintaining a diverse community.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four named weeds accounted for about 90% of total weed density.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
total weed densitye0
Value
~90%e0
Qualifier
Galium aparine L., Veronica persica Poir., Vicia sativa L. and Geranium carolinianum L.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four dominant weeds (Galium aparine L., Veronica persica Poir., Vicia sativa L. and Geranium carolinianum L.) accounted for ~90% of the total weed density in the 2 years of experimental duration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1571 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat–soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–856 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual weed community assembly was associated primarily with available topsoil nutrients in the order P, N, K.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Compound
topsoil available nutrientse0
Outcome
residual weed community assemblye0
Qualifier
P > N > Ke0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual weed community assembly was influenced primarily by topsoil available nutrients in the order P > N > K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1688 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat–soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–856 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop weed competition for nutrients and sunlight was identified as the main indirect fertilization effect on weed community composition.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
weed community compositione0
Qualifier
Competition for nutrients and solar radiation between crops and weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competition for nutrients and solar radiation between crops and weeds was the main indirect effect of fertilization on the changes in weed community composition and species diversity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1872 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat–soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–856 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop weed competition for nutrients and sunlight was identified as the main indirect fertilization effect on weed species diversity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
species diversitye0
Qualifier
Competition for nutrients and solar radiation between crops and weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competition for nutrients and solar radiation between crops and weeds was the main indirect effect of fertilization on the changes in weed community composition and species diversity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1872 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat–soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–856 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed diversity indices had significant linear relationships with wheat yield.

Outcome
wheat yielde0
Qualifier
significant linear relationshipse0
Comparator
indices of species diversitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The indices of species diversity (species richness, Shannon–Wiener, Pielou and Simpson indices) showed significant linear relationships with wheat yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–2026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced fertilization more efficiently inhibited potential weed growth through wheat interception of solar radiation.

Treatment
balanced fertilization treatmente0
Outcome
potential growth of weedse0
Direction
inhibitinge0
Qualifier
solar radiation being intercepted by wheate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The balanced fertilization treatment was more efficient at inhibiting the potential growth of weeds because of solar radiation being intercepted by wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced fertilization favored wheat yield.

Treatment
balanced fertilizatione0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat yield is favored by balanced fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2224–2272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PK fertilization favored weed density.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
PK fertilizatione0
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weed community is favored by PK fertilization in terms of density and diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2282–2365 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat–soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PK fertilization favored weed diversity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
PK fertilizatione0
Outcome
diversitye0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weed community is favored by PK fertilization in terms of density and diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2282–2365 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat–soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–856 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP and NK treatments provided intermediate wheat production and maintained a diverse weed community.

Treatment
NP and NK treatmentse0
Outcome
increasing wheat production and to a level maintaining a diverse communitye0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the NP and NK treatments, which are intermediate in terms of increasing wheat production and to a level maintaining a diverse community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2531–2666 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

85 papers: 49 positive, 36 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

fertilization · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 63 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.