Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Comparative Analysis of Energy and GHG Emissions Using Fixed and Variable Fertilization Rates

Marius Kazlauskas; Indrė Bručienė; Algirdas Jasinskas; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
31
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Reducing the overuse of mineral fertilizers in crop production is a key factor related to healthier soil, healthier food, and more economical, efficient, and cleaner agricultural production. The aim of this study was to investigate and to compare the effects of fixed and variable rate fertilization with fertilizer consumption, energy consumption, and environmental impact. A 4-year experimental field study using crop rotation of four plants (spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba bean) was performed. Fertilization with phosphorus and potassium at a variable rate were performed and applied based on the soil properties analyzed before the start of the research and completion of the fertilization maps. Nitrogen fertilization was performed by additional fertilization using a proximal N-sensor, which gives the accurate nitrogen uptake in plants in real-time. This was followed by a comparative evaluation analysis of variables and conventional fixed-rate fertilization methods to assess fertilizer consumption, energy consumption, environmental impact, and economic efficiency. The results of the study showed that an application of a variable fertilization rate can reduce the total amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers by 24.9%, energy consumption by 3463.1 kg ha−1, and emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) by 341.5 kg CO2eq ha−1 compared to fixed fertilization rate. The method of fertilization with a variable application rate reduced the costs of fertilization, and at the same time, the costs of the total plant production by €168.0 ha−1, on average.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable fertilization reduced total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer use by 24.9% relative to fixed rates.

Taxon
spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba beanBrassica napusVicia fabaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
variable fertilization ratee0
Outcome
total amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizerse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
24.9%e0
Comparator
fixed fertilization ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an application of a variable fertilization rate can reduce the total amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers by 24.9%, energy consumption by 3463.1 kg ha−1, and emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) by 341.5 kg CO2eq ha−1 compared to fixed fertilization rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop rotation of four plants (spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba bean)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable fertilization reduced energy consumption by 3463.1 kg ha−1 relative to fixed rates.

Taxon
spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba beanBrassica napusVicia fabaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
variable fertilization ratee0
Outcome
energy consumptione0
Direction
reducee0
Value
3463.1 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
fixed fertilization ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an application of a variable fertilization rate can reduce the total amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers by 24.9%, energy consumption by 3463.1 kg ha−1, and emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) by 341.5 kg CO2eq ha−1 compared to fixed fertilization rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop rotation of four plants (spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba bean)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable fertilization reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 341.5 kg CO2eq ha−1 relative to fixed rates.

Taxon
spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba beanBrassica napusVicia fabaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
variable fertilization ratee0
Outcome
emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG)e0
Direction
reducee0
Value
341.5 kg CO2eq ha−1e0
Comparator
fixed fertilization ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an application of a variable fertilization rate can reduce the total amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers by 24.9%, energy consumption by 3463.1 kg ha−1, and emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) by 341.5 kg CO2eq ha−1 compared to fixed fertilization rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop rotation of four plants (spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba bean)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable rate fertilization reduced fertilization costs.

Taxon
spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba beanBrassica napusVicia fabaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilization with a variable application ratee0
Outcome
costs of fertilizatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The method of fertilization with a variable application rate reduced the costs of fertilization, and at the same time, the costs of the total plant production by €168.0 ha−1, on average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop rotation of four plants (spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba bean)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable rate fertilization reduced total plant production costs by €168.0 ha−1 on average.

Taxon
spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba beanBrassica napusVicia fabaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilization with a variable application ratee0
Outcome
costs of the total plant productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
€168.0 ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The method of fertilization with a variable application rate reduced the costs of fertilization, and at the same time, the costs of the total plant production by €168.0 ha−1, on average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop rotation of four plants (spring barley, winter oilseed rape, winter wheat, and faba bean)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–509 · show in text ↑

fertilization · environment: emissions · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · pest · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · environment: emissions · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · pest · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 29 positive, 18 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fertilization · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 63 positive, 21 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 159 positive, 17 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.