Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilization treatments NPK, NP, NK and PK significantly reduced weed species number and the Shannon-Wiener index relative to the unfertilized control.

A claim from Effects of long-term fertilization treatments on the weed seed bank in a wheat-soybean rotation system · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization treatments NPK, NP, NK and PK significantly reduced weed species number and the Shannon-Wiener index relative to the unfertilized control.

Treatment
NPK, NP, NK, and PK fertilizatione1
Interactor
weed speciese1weed
Outcome
Numbers of weed species present and the Shannon-Wiener indexe1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
fertilization-free control treatment (CK)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Numbers of weed species present and the Shannon-Wiener index were significantly lower under NPK, NP, NK, and PK fertilization treatments than under the fertilization-free control treatment (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–556
e5

“in the wheat-soybean rotation system studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1059

Title

Effects of long-term fertilization treatments on the weed seed bank in a wheat-soybean rotation system

Junfeng Pan; LiGan Zhang; Li Wang; et al. Global Ecology and Conservation 2019. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00870

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-cf7ca0759bff99fa90bf484448459b2af68c82debb74cbe89c9c00027f066368 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

85 papers: 49 positive, 36 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

nanoparticle · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.