Claim · model-written summary
Weed N uptake and growth with fresh and composted manure were similar to or greater than with broadcast N fertilizer in subsequent years
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivume5 - Treatment
- fresh and composted manuree3
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- Weed N uptake and growthe3
- Direction
- similar to or greater thane4
- Qualifier
- in subsequent yearse4
- Comparator
- broadcast N fertilizere4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Subsurface‐banded N compared with broadcast N fertilizer often reduced N uptake by weeds”
e3“Weed N uptake and growth with fresh and composted manure tended to be intermediary between banded and broadcast N fertilizer in the initial year”
e4“but was similar to or greater than that with broadcast N fertilizer in subsequent years”
e5“spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) yield”
Title
Nitrogen Fertilizer, Manure, and Compost Effects on Weed Growth and Competition with Spring Wheat
R. E. Blackshaw Agronomy Journal 2005. doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0155
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Subsurface-banded N often reduced N uptake by weeds compared with broadcast N fertilizer
- Intervention effect Subsurface-banded N decreased weed biomass compared with broadcast N fertilizer
- Intervention effect Subsurface-banded N increased spring wheat yield compared with broadcast N fertilizer
- Intervention effect Weed N uptake and growth with fresh and composted manure were intermediate between banded and broadcast N fertilizer in the initial year
- Observation Weed seedbank ranking after the 4-year experiment placed composted manure and fresh manure highest and banded N fertilizer lowest