Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Agronomy

A study of wheat-weed response and economical analysis to fertilization and post-emergence herbicides under arid climatic conditions

Sarita; Ishwar Singh; Moti Lal Mehriya; et al.

13
claims
43
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A two-year field experiment was conducted in two consecutive rabi seasons under arid climatic conditions to examine the effect of different fertility levels and herbicides on weed dynamics and the performance of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Results revealed that a significantly minimum weed dry weight was recorded with 75% RDF (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (90-30 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha). Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF. This treatment remains at par with 125% RDF (150-50 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) except for the leaf area index at 75 DAS. Among the herbicidal treatments, application of the ready-to-use herbicides clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/ha provided a superior value of weed indices i.e. higher weed control efficiency (91.30), crop resistance-index, and herbicide efficiency-index, and lower weed-index (1.91) over other herbicides. This treatment also exhibited significantly higher plant height (92.33 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (325.5g/meter row length), crop growth rate (16.49 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index (3.15), net assimilation rate, length of the spike (14.28 cm), number of spike/meter row length (153.0), number of grains/spike (44.52), grain yield (4374 kg/ha), straw yield (5381 kg/ha) and biological yield (9755 kg/ha) over weedy check plot, which was followed by sulfosulfuron 75% + metsulfuron methyl 5% @ 32 g/ha, both of which remained statistically at par with each other except for the number of grains/spike. The application of 100% RDF and clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/ha recorded higher net returns and maximum B: C ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% recommended fertilizer dose produced the lowest weed dry weight.

Treatment
75% RDF (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (90-30 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significantly minimum weed dry weight was recorded with 75% RDF (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) (90-30 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–389 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% fertilizer dose raised weed dry weight at 35 days and harvest relative to 75%.

Treatment
100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.50 g/m 2e0
Comparator
75% RDFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% fertilizer dose increased wheat grain yield to 4083 kg/ha over 75%.

Treatment
100% RDFe1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
4083 kg/hae0
Comparator
75% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% fertilizer dose increased straw yield to 5019 kg/ha over 75%.

Treatment
100% RDFe1
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
5019 kg/hae0
Comparator
75% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% fertilizer dose increased biological yield to 9103 kg/ha over 75%.

Treatment
100% RDFe1
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
9103 kg/hae0
Comparator
75% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% fertilizer dose was comparable with 125%, except for leaf area index at 75 days.

Treatment
100% RDFe1
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Qualifier
except for the leaf area index at 75 DASe0
Comparator
125% RDF (150-50 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment remains at par with 125% RDF (150-50 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) except for the leaf area index at 75 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The clodinafop plus metsulfuron treatment achieved higher weed control efficiency of 91.30.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
91.30e0
Comparator
other herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of the ready-to-use herbicides clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/ha provided a superior value of weed indices i.e. higher weed control efficiency (91.30), crop resistance-index, and herbicide efficiency-index, and lower weed-index (1.91) over other herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same herbicide treatment produced a lower weed index of 1.91.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed-indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.91e0
Comparator
other herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of the ready-to-use herbicides clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/ha provided a superior value of weed indices i.e. higher weed control efficiency (91.30), crop resistance-index, and herbicide efficiency-index, and lower weed-index (1.91) over other herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same herbicide treatment increased grain yield to 4374 kg/ha over the weedy check.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/hae2
Interactor
weedye0weede1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
4374 kg/hae0
Comparator
weedy check plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (4374 kg/ha), straw yield (5381 kg/ha) and biological yield (9755 kg/ha) over weedy check plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of the ready-to-use herbicides clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/ha provided a superior value of weed indices i.e. higher weed control efficiency (91.30), crop resistance-index, and herbicide efficiency-index, and lower weed-index (1.91) over other herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same herbicide treatment increased straw yield to 5381 kg/ha over the weedy check.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/hae2
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
5381 kg/hae0
Comparator
weedy check plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (4374 kg/ha), straw yield (5381 kg/ha) and biological yield (9755 kg/ha) over weedy check plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of the ready-to-use herbicides clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/ha provided a superior value of weed indices i.e. higher weed control efficiency (91.30), crop resistance-index, and herbicide efficiency-index, and lower weed-index (1.91) over other herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same herbicide treatment increased biological yield to 9755 kg/ha over the weedy check.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/hae2
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
9755 kg/hae0
Comparator
weedy check plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (4374 kg/ha), straw yield (5381 kg/ha) and biological yield (9755 kg/ha) over weedy check plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of the ready-to-use herbicides clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/ha provided a superior value of weed indices i.e. higher weed control efficiency (91.30), crop resistance-index, and herbicide efficiency-index, and lower weed-index (1.91) over other herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The clodinafop mixture and sulfosulfuron mixture were mostly statistically comparable except for grains per spike.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/hae2
Outcome
statistically at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Qualifier
except for the number of grains/spikee0
Comparator
sulfosulfuron 75% + metsulfuron methyl 5% @ 32 g/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was followed by sulfosulfuron 75% + metsulfuron methyl 5% @ 32 g/ha, both of which remained statistically at par with each other except for the number of grains/spike.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–1983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of the ready-to-use herbicides clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/ha provided a superior value of weed indices i.e. higher weed control efficiency (91.30), crop resistance-index, and herbicide efficiency-index, and lower weed-index (1.91) over other herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% fertilizer dose with the clodinafop mixture gave higher net returns and maximum benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
100% RDF and clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/hae0
Outcome
net returns and maximum B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100% RDF and clodinafop-propargyl 15% + metsulfuron methyl 1% @ 64 g/ha recorded higher net returns and maximum B: C ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1984–2126 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P 2 O 5 /ha) recorded significantly higher weed dry weight at 35 DAS (Days After Sowing) (16.50 g/m 2 ) and harvest (28.15 g/m 2 ), growth and yield attributes i.e. plant height (89.14 cm), crop dry matter accumulation (300.8 g/meter row length), crop growth rate (17.08 g/m 2 /day), leaf area index at 50 DAS (3.06, net assimilation rate 50-75 DAS, length of the spike (13.36 cm), number of grains/spike (41.52), grain yield (4083 kg/ha), straw yield (5019 kg/ha) and biological yield (9103 kg/ha) over 75% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–939 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 37 positive, 4 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

85 papers: 49 positive, 36 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.