Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2021-22 at Research Farm A, College of Agriculture, Ganj Basoda, District Vidisha (M.P.) to evaluate the bio-efficacy of tank-mix herbicides in wheat. The experiment consisting of nine treatments was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. The results revealed that tank-mix application of clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 reduced significantly the weed density (14.61 No./m2), dry weight (24.73 g/m2) and weed index (3.25%) while highest weed control efficiency (85.26%), herbicide efficiency index (3.587), weed persistence index (1.229), crop resistance index (9.368), grain yield (4854 kg ha-1) and crop dry matter yield (12643 kg ha-1) to over all the herbicidal treatments but found at par with clodinafop propargyl + metribuzin @ 60 + 175 and clodinafop propargyl + carfentrazone ethyl @ 60 + 20 g a.i. ha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
The clodinafop plus metsulfuron mix significantly reduced weed density to 14.61 No./m2.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e0
- Outcome
- weed densitye0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 14.61 No./m2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tank-mix application of clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 reduced significantly the weed density (14.61 No./m2)”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The mix significantly reduced weed dry weight to 24.73 g/m2.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e0
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 24.73 g/m2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tank-mix application of clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 reduced significantly the weed density (14.61 No./m2), dry weight (24.73 g/m2)”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The mix significantly reduced weed index to 3.25%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e0
- Outcome
- weed indexe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 3.25%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tank-mix application of clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 reduced significantly the weed density (14.61 No./m2), dry weight (24.73 g/m2) and weed index (3.25%)”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The mix had the highest weed control efficiency, 85.26%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e0
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 85.26%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 reduced significantly the weed density (14.61 No./m2), dry weight (24.73 g/m2) and weed index (3.25%) while highest weed control efficiency (85.26%)”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The mix had the highest herbicide efficiency index, 3.587.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e1
- Outcome
- herbicide efficiency indexe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 3.587e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest weed control efficiency (85.26%), herbicide efficiency index (3.587)”
e1“clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The mix had the highest weed persistence index, 1.229.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e1
- Outcome
- weed persistence indexe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.229e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest weed control efficiency (85.26%), herbicide efficiency index (3.587), weed persistence index (1.229)”
e1“clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The mix had the highest crop resistance index, 9.368.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e1
- Outcome
- crop resistance indexe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 9.368e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest weed control efficiency (85.26%), herbicide efficiency index (3.587), weed persistence index (1.229), crop resistance index (9.368)”
e1“clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The mix had the highest wheat grain yield, 4854 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4854 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest weed control efficiency (85.26%), herbicide efficiency index (3.587), weed persistence index (1.229), crop resistance index (9.368), grain yield (4854 kg ha-1)”
e1“clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The mix had the highest wheat crop dry matter yield, 12643 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e1
- Outcome
- crop dry matter yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 12643 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest weed control efficiency (85.26%), herbicide efficiency index (3.587), weed persistence index (1.229), crop resistance index (9.368), grain yield (4854 kg ha-1) and crop dry matter yield (12643 kg ha-1)”
e1“clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The clodinafop plus metsulfuron treatment was at par with clodinafop plus metribuzin.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- at pare0
- Comparator
- clodinafop propargyl + metribuzin @ 60 + 175e0
Not reportedMaterial
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“found at par with clodinafop propargyl + metribuzin @ 60 + 175”
e1“clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The clodinafop plus metsulfuron treatment was at par with clodinafop plus carfentrazone.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- at pare0
- Comparator
- clodinafop propargyl + carfentrazone ethyl @ 60 + 20 g a.i. ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“found at par with clodinafop propargyl + metribuzin @ 60 + 175 and clodinafop propargyl + carfentrazone ethyl @ 60 + 20 g a.i. ha-1”
e1“clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →metsulfuron methyl · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
methyl · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
methyl · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
130 papers more in this group
See all 134 papers →metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
151 papers more in this group
See all 155 papers →8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.