Paper · 2022 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for higher yield and profit in Hathras district of Uttar Pradesh

Shyam Singh

13
claims
32
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Present study entitled “Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for higher yield and profit in Hathras District of Uttar Pradesh” was conducted during two consecutive Rabi seasons of years 2015-16 and 2016-17 at farmer’s fields in district Hathras, to find out the best suitable alternate of weed management practice in wheat crop. Front Line Demonstrations (FLDs) were conducted on an area of 16.0 ha with active participation of 40 farmers of 29 different villages with improved technologies composed HD-2967 variety and recommended package of practices. Two different weed control technologies viz., (1) Sulfosulfuron 75 WG + Metsulfuron 5 WG @30g a.i./ha at 35 DAS and (2) Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP @ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WG, were demonstrated. The results revealed that both the treatment gave higher grain yield, gross return and net return as compared to farmers practice (Sulfosulfuron 75 WG @33.3 g/ha at 40 DAS). The maximum grain yield (42.8q/ha with HI of 40.61%) was obtained during the year 2016-17 when Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP @ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WG was applied which was 17.58% higher than the yield of farmers practice. This was followed by treatment of Sulfosulfuron 75 WG + Metsulfuron 5 WG @30g a.i./ha at 35 DAS which produced yield of 38.1q/ha with an increment of 14.07% over farmers practice. The similar trend was also observed for Biological yield of wheat. However no definite trend was noticed for harvest index. Economic analysis of different weed control methods also revealed that both the demonstrated technologies were found effective to weed management and profitable over farmers practice. The highest net returns (Rs. 51260 ha-1) was observed for application of Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP @ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WG treatment. The increment in net return due to weed control treatments was recorded highest (28.65%) during the year 2016-17 when Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP @ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WG was applied which also gave the maximum increase in gross return of Rs. 6.71per rupee additionally invested. It was concluded that Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP@ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WG or premixed weedicide Sulfosulfuron 75 WG + Metsulfuron 5 WG @ 30 g a.i./ha at 35 DAS should be used for obtaining higher grain yield, straw yield, gross and net income with higher B: C ratio from wheat under Hathras conditions of Uttar Pradesh.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both weed control technologies gave higher grain yield, gross return and net return than farmers practice

Treatment
weed control technologiese3
Outcome
grain yield, gross return and net returne1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
farmers practicee1
Setting
farmer’s fieldse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that both the treatment gave higher grain yield, gross return and net return as compared to farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–940 · show in text ↑
e2

“at farmer’s fields in district Hathras”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–282 · show in text ↑
e3

“Two different weed control technologies viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum grain yield of 42.8 q/ha was obtained with Clodinafop-Propargyl plus Metsulfuron methyl in 2016-17

Treatment
Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP @ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WGe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
42.8q/hae1
Comparator
farmers practicee2
Setting
the year 2016-17e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum grain yield (42.8q/ha with HI of 40.61%) was obtained during the year 2016-17 when Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP @ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WG was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1170 · show in text ↑
e2

“which was 17.58% higher than the yield of farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-Propargyl plus Metsulfuron methyl gave grain yield 17.58% higher than farmers practice

Treatment
Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP @ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WGe2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
17.58%e1
Comparator
farmers practicee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“which was 17.58% higher than the yield of farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1229 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum grain yield (42.8q/ha with HI of 40.61%) was obtained during the year 2016-17 when Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP @ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WG was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1170 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The harvest index was 40.61% for the maximum grain yield

Outcome
HIe1
Value
40.61%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum grain yield (42.8q/ha with HI of 40.61%) was obtained during the year 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron plus Metsulfuron yielded 38.1 q/ha

Treatment
Sulfosulfuron 75 WG + Metsulfuron 5 WG @30g a.i./ha at 35 DASe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
producede1
Value
38.1q/hae1
Comparator
farmers practicee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“This was followed by treatment of Sulfosulfuron 75 WG + Metsulfuron 5 WG @30g a.i./ha at 35 DAS which produced yield of 38.1q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1359 · show in text ↑
e2

“with an increment of 14.07% over farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron plus Metsulfuron gave a 14.07% yield increment over farmers practice

Treatment
Sulfosulfuron 75 WG + Metsulfuron 5 WG @30g a.i./ha at 35 DASe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
incremente2
Value
14.07%e2
Comparator
farmers practicee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“This was followed by treatment of Sulfosulfuron 75 WG + Metsulfuron 5 WG @30g a.i./ha at 35 DAS which produced yield of 38.1q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1359 · show in text ↑
e2

“with an increment of 14.07% over farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1409 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological yield of wheat showed a similar trend

Outcome
Biological yielde1
Qualifier
similar trende1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The similar trend was also observed for Biological yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No definite trend was noticed for harvest index

Outcome
harvest indexe1
Qualifier
no definite trende1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“However no definite trend was noticed for harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1533 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest net returns of Rs. 51260 per ha were obtained with Clodinafop-Propargyl plus Metsulfuron methyl

Treatment
Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP @ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WGe1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
Rs. 51260 ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest net returns (Rs. 51260 ha-1) was observed for application of Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP @ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WG treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1880 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increment in net return due to weed control was highest (28.65%) in 2016-17

Outcome
increment in net returne1
Direction
higheste1
Value
28.65%e1
Setting
the year 2016-17e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increment in net return due to weed control treatments was recorded highest (28.65%) during the year 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–1994 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross return increased by a maximum of Rs. 6.71 per rupee additionally invested

Outcome
gross returne1
Direction
maximum increasee1
Value
Rs. 6.71per rupeee1
Qualifier
additionally investede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum increase in gross return of Rs. 6.71per rupee additionally invested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both demonstrated weed control technologies were effective for weed management and profitable over farmers practice

Outcome
effective to weed management and profitablee1
Comparator
farmers practicee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“both the demonstrated technologies were found effective to weed management and profitable over farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1717 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-Propargyl plus Metsulfuron methyl or premixed Sulfosulfuron plus Metsulfuron should be used for higher grain yield, straw yield, gross and net income and B:C ratio in wheat under Hathras conditions

Outcome
higher grain yield, straw yield, gross and net income with higher B: C ratioe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Studies on chemical weed control practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“It was concluded that Clodinafop-Propargyl 15 WP@ 60 g a.i./ha (400 g/ha) +Metsulfuron methyl 20 WG or premixed weedicide Sulfosulfuron 75 WG + Metsulfuron 5 WG @ 30 g a.i./ha at 35 DAS should be used for obtaining higher grain yield, straw yield, gross and net income with higher B: C ratio from wheat under Hathras conditions of Uttar Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2188–2532 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 37 positive, 4 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.