Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The mix had the highest weed control efficiency, 85.26%.

A claim from Efficacy of clodinafop propargyl alone and its compatibility with other herbicides on weed indices and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mix had the highest weed control efficiency, 85.26%.

Treatment
clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
85.26%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop propargyl + metsulfuron methyl @ 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 reduced significantly the weed density (14.61 No./m2), dry weight (24.73 g/m2) and weed index (3.25%) while highest weed control efficiency (85.26%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–581
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–147

Title

Efficacy of clodinafop propargyl alone and its compatibility with other herbicides on weed indices and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Kapil Kumar Sikeriya; Anay Rawat; PK Mishra; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i5sc.748

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-760f006c2ac2cb9dd86135f6a3d09756f7d5215824a63fa32713364921cb6dd9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

125 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.