Paper · 2015 · Agriculture (Pol nohospodárstvo)

Response Of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) And Associated Grassy Weeds Grown In Salt-Affected Soil To Effects Of Graminicides And Indole Acetic Acid

Ibrahim M. El-Metwally; Osama A.M. Ali; Magdi T. Abdelhamid

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Two field experiments were carried out in two successive seasons to examine the effect of weed management on wheat crop under saline condition and how herbicides can interact with foliar application with indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) to improve weed suppression and enhance crop growth and productivity under salinity stress. Clodinafop-propargyl was the best option to attain acceptable grassy weeds control. Increasing IAA from 0 up to 150 ppm significantly increased number and dry weight of grassy weeds in wheat after 80 days from sowing. Application of IAA at 150 ppm recorded the highest number and dry weight of weeds. Clodinafop-propargyl produced the lowest values of number and dry weight of weeds as well as nutrients uptake by weeds when water spraying was added. While application of IAA at 150 ppm gave the maximum values of flag leaf area, SPAD meter values, number of spike/m 2 , spike length, number of spikelets/spike, grains number/spike, grains weight/spike, as well as grain, straw, and total crude protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages when clodinafop-propargyl treatment was applied. It could be concluded that using IAA at 150 ppm resulted in enhancement of growth and productivity of wheat crop when integrated with clodinafop-propargyl treatment under salinity condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl was the best grassy weed control option.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyle0
Interactor
grassy weedse0weed
Outcome
grassy weeds controle0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl was the best option to attain acceptable grassy weeds control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing IAA significantly increased grassy weed number and dry weight in wheat.

Treatment
IAA from 0 up to 150 ppme0
Interactor
grassy weedse0weed
Outcome
number and dry weight of grassy weedse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 80 days from sowinge0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing IAA from 0 up to 150 ppm significantly increased number and dry weight of grassy weeds in wheat after 80 days from sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA at 150 ppm gave the highest weed number and dry weight.

Treatment
IAA at 150 ppme0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number and dry weight of weedse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of IAA at 150 ppm recorded the highest number and dry weight of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl with water spraying minimized weed number and dry weight.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyle0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number and dry weight of weedse0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
when water spraying was addede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl produced the lowest values of number and dry weight of weeds as well as nutrients uptake by weeds when water spraying was added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl with water spraying minimized nutrient uptake by weeds.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyle0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
nutrients uptake by weedse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop-propargyl produced the lowest values of number and dry weight of weeds as well as nutrients uptake by weeds when water spraying was added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA at 150 ppm with clodinafop-propargyl maximized wheat leaf area and SPAD values.

Treatment
IAA at 150 ppme0
Outcome
flag leaf area, SPAD meter valuese0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
when clodinafop-propargyl treatment was appliede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA at 150 ppm gave the maximum values of flag leaf area, SPAD meter values, number of spike/m 2 , spike length, number of spikelets/spike, grains number/spike, grains weight/spike, as well as grain, straw, and total crude protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages when clodinafop-propargyl treatment was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA at 150 ppm with clodinafop-propargyl maximized wheat spike traits.

Treatment
IAA at 150 ppme0
Outcome
number of spike/m 2 , spike length, number of spikelets/spikee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA at 150 ppm gave the maximum values of flag leaf area, SPAD meter values, number of spike/m 2 , spike length, number of spikelets/spike, grains number/spike, grains weight/spike, as well as grain, straw, and total crude protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages when clodinafop-propargyl treatment was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA at 150 ppm with clodinafop-propargyl maximized wheat grain traits.

Treatment
IAA at 150 ppme0
Outcome
grains number/spike, grains weight/spikee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA at 150 ppm gave the maximum values of flag leaf area, SPAD meter values, number of spike/m 2 , spike length, number of spikelets/spike, grains number/spike, grains weight/spike, as well as grain, straw, and total crude protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages when clodinafop-propargyl treatment was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA at 150 ppm with clodinafop-propargyl maximized wheat grain and straw.

Treatment
IAA at 150 ppme0
Outcome
grain, strawe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA at 150 ppm gave the maximum values of flag leaf area, SPAD meter values, number of spike/m 2 , spike length, number of spikelets/spike, grains number/spike, grains weight/spike, as well as grain, straw, and total crude protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages when clodinafop-propargyl treatment was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA at 150 ppm with clodinafop-propargyl maximized wheat protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages.

Treatment
IAA at 150 ppme0
Outcome
total crude protein, phosphorus and potassium percentagese0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA at 150 ppm gave the maximum values of flag leaf area, SPAD meter values, number of spike/m 2 , spike length, number of spikelets/spike, grains number/spike, grains weight/spike, as well as grain, straw, and total crude protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages when clodinafop-propargyl treatment was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑

indole-3-acetic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

indole-3-acetic acid · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

indole-3-acetic acid · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.