Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Comparative Efficacy of Herbicides Applied in Wheat and their Residual Effect on the Succeeding Crops

H.L. Yadav; A.K. Gupta; Sudesh Kumar; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The field experiment conducted at research farm, RARI, Durgapura for two consecutive years during rabi seasons 2013-14 and 2014-15. Results revealed that maximum reduction in weed density at 25 DAS was recorded with pendimethalin pre emergence @ 0.750 kg/ha and at 50 DAS with 2, 4-D ester @ 0.5 kg/ha, clodinafop propanyl 15 % + metsulfuran methyl 1 % @ 64 g a.i./ha and metsulfuran methyl @ 4 g a.i./ha. All the weed control treatments produced significantly higher grain and straw yield compared to weedy check. Hand weeding, except weed free produced the maximum grain and straw yield of 46.40 and 56.20 q/ha and thus out yielded over rest of the treatment. Being at par with clodinafop propargyl 15 % + metsulfuran methyl 1 % @ 64 g a.i. /ha and sulfosulfuran 75 % +metsulfuran methyl 5 WG @ 32 g a.i. /ha, application of clodinafop propargyl 15 % + metsulfuran methyl 1 % @ 64 g a.i. /ha registered an increase of 32.6 and 35.1 per cent in grain and straw yield, respectively over weedy check and thus found as the next superior herbicidal treatment. Further, none of the applied herbicides/mixtures in rabi season (wheat) had residual toxicity on germination of predominant crops (pearlmillet, mungbean and clusterbean) grown in kharif season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin had the maximum reduction in weed density at 25 DAS.

Treatment
pendimethalin pre emergence @ 0.750 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
maximum reductione0
Qualifier
25 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction in weed density at 25 DAS was recorded with pendimethalin pre emergence @ 0.750 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–257 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D ester gave maximum weed density reduction at 50 DAS.

Treatment
2, 4-D ester @ 0.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
maximum reductione0
Qualifier
50 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction in weed density at 25 DAS was recorded with pendimethalin pre emergence @ 0.750 kg/ha and at 50 DAS with 2, 4-D ester @ 0.5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop propanyl plus metsulfuran methyl gave maximum weed density reduction at 50 DAS.

Treatment
clodinafop propanyl 15 % + metsulfuran methyl 1 % @ 64 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
maximum reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction in weed density at 25 DAS was recorded with pendimethalin pre emergence @ 0.750 kg/ha and at 50 DAS with 2, 4-D ester @ 0.5 kg/ha, clodinafop propanyl 15 % + metsulfuran methyl 1 % @ 64 g a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metsulfuran methyl gave maximum weed density reduction at 50 DAS.

Treatment
metsulfuran methyl @ 4 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
maximum reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction in weed density at 25 DAS was recorded with pendimethalin pre emergence @ 0.750 kg/ha and at 50 DAS with 2, 4-D ester @ 0.5 kg/ha, clodinafop propanyl 15 % + metsulfuran methyl 1 % @ 64 g a.i./ha and metsulfuran methyl @ 4 g a.i./ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control treatments significantly increased wheat grain yield over the weedy check.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed control treatments produced significantly higher grain and straw yield compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding produced 46.40 q/ha grain yield, the maximum apart from weed-free plots.

Treatment
Hand weedinge0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
maximume0
Value
46.40e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding, except weed free produced the maximum grain and straw yield of 46.40 and 56.20 q/ha and thus out yielded over rest of the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding produced 56.20 q/ha straw yield, the maximum apart from weed-free plots.

Treatment
Hand weedinge0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
56.20 q/hae0
Comparator
rest of the treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding, except weed free produced the maximum grain and straw yield of 46.40 and 56.20 q/ha and thus out yielded over rest of the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop propargyl plus metsulfuran methyl increased grain yield 32.6 per cent over the weedy check.

Treatment
clodinafop propargyl 15 % + metsulfuran methyl 1 % @ 64 g a.i. /hae0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32.6e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of clodinafop propargyl 15 % + metsulfuran methyl 1 % @ 64 g a.i. /ha registered an increase of 32.6 and 35.1 per cent in grain and straw yield, respectively over weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop propargyl plus metsulfuran methyl increased straw yield 35.1 per cent over the weedy check.

Treatment
clodinafop propargyl 15 % + metsulfuran methyl 1 % @ 64 g a.i. /hae0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
35.1 per cente0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of clodinafop propargyl 15 % + metsulfuran methyl 1 % @ 64 g a.i. /ha registered an increase of 32.6 and 35.1 per cent in grain and straw yield, respectively over weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide mixtures caused no residual toxicity in pearlmillet germination.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
applied herbicides/mixturese0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
nonee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the applied herbicides/mixtures in rabi season (wheat) had residual toxicity on germination of predominant crops (pearlmillet, mungbean and clusterbean) grown in kharif season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide mixtures caused no residual toxicity in mungbean germination.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
applied herbicides/mixturese0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
nonee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the applied herbicides/mixtures in rabi season (wheat) had residual toxicity on germination of predominant crops (pearlmillet, mungbean and clusterbean) grown in kharif season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide mixtures caused no residual toxicity in clusterbean germination.

Treatment
applied herbicides/mixturese0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
nonee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the applied herbicides/mixtures in rabi season (wheat) had residual toxicity on germination of predominant crops (pearlmillet, mungbean and clusterbean) grown in kharif season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1249 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 37 positive, 4 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 46 positive, 2 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

ester · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

herbicide · growth · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.