Paper · 2020 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effects of sowing dates and weed management on productivity of irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum)

NEETU SHARMA; ANIL KUMAR; B C SHARMA; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2012–13 and 2013–14 at research farm of SKUAST-Jammu to study the effect of sowing dates and weed management practices on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Among sowing dates, 15th November sown crop recorded lowest total weed density and total dry weight of weeds as compared to crop sown on 25th December. Crop sown on 15th November also recorded highest yield attributes and grain yield which ultimately led to maximum net returns of ₹51316/ha and B:C ratio (1.06). Significantly low weed density and dry matter of weeds and higher grain yield were recorded with ready mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha. Maximum weed control efficiency, crop resistance index and lowest weed index, weed persistence index were observed with the application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha. Significantly highest sedimentation value, crude protein and glutenin content was also recorded with the ready mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha as post emergence. Maximum benefit:cost ratio was also obtained with the application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sown on 15th November had the lowest total weed density and total weed dry weight compared with sowing on 25th December.

Treatment
15th November sown crope0
Outcome
total weed density and total dry weight of weedse0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
crop sown on 25th Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among sowing dates, 15th November sown crop recorded lowest total weed density and total dry weight of weeds as compared to crop sown on 25th December”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–363 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sown on 15th November recorded the highest yield attributes and grain yield.

Treatment
Crop sown on 15th Novembere0
Outcome
yield attributes and grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop sown on 15th November also recorded highest yield attributes and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sown on 15th November gave maximum net returns of ₹51316/ha.

Treatment
Crop sown on 15th Novembere0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
₹51316/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop sown on 15th November also recorded highest yield attributes and grain yield which ultimately led to maximum net returns of ₹51316/ha and B:C ratio (1.06)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sown on 15th November gave a maximum benefit:cost ratio of 1.06.

Treatment
Crop sown on 15th Novembere0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.06e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop sown on 15th November also recorded highest yield attributes and grain yield which ultimately led to maximum net returns of ₹51316/ha and B:C ratio (1.06)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron gave significantly lower weed density and weed dry matter in wheat.

Treatment
ready mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/hae0
Outcome
weed density and dry matter of weedse0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly low weed density and dry matter of weeds and higher grain yield were recorded with ready mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron gave higher wheat grain yield.

Treatment
ready mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly low weed density and dry matter of weeds and higher grain yield were recorded with ready mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron gave maximum weed control efficiency and crop resistance index.

Treatment
application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/hae0
Outcome
weed control efficiency, crop resistance indexe0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum weed control efficiency, crop resistance index and lowest weed index, weed persistence index were observed with the application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron gave the lowest weed index and weed persistence index.

Treatment
application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/hae0
Outcome
weed index, weed persistence indexe0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum weed control efficiency, crop resistance index and lowest weed index, weed persistence index were observed with the application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix post-emergence sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron gave significantly highest sedimentation value, crude protein and glutenin content in wheat.

Treatment
ready mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha as post emergencee0
Outcome
sedimentation value, crude protein and glutenin contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly highest sedimentation value, crude protein and glutenin content was also recorded with the ready mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha as post emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron gave the maximum benefit:cost ratio.

Treatment
application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/hae0
Outcome
benefit:cost ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum benefit:cost ratio was also obtained with the application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 30 g/ha + 2 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑

metsulfuron methyl · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.