Paper · 1969 · Canadian Journal of Biochemistry

Folate derivatives in healthy and rust-infected primary leaves of wheat

R. Rohringer; W. K. Kim; D. J. Samborski

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Six days after inoculation, crude extracts were prepared from healthy and rust-infected wheat leaves of a susceptible line and from healthy and rust-infected wheat leaves of a resistant line. Extracts from rust-infected leaves of both lines contained 50% more folates, active as growth factors for Lactobacillus casei, than did those from healthy leaves. Rust-infected leaves did not differ from healthy leaves in their content of folates active as growth factors for Streptococcus faecalis and Pediococcus cerevisiae.All extracts were fractionated on DEAE-cellulose columns. The eluate fractions were treated with chicken pancreas conjugase and assayed with L. casei. All extracts yielded similar folate profiles consisting of five major and three minor peaks. Conjugase treatment and differential assay of the peak fractions with L. casei, S. faecalis, and P. cerevisiae indicated that the eluates contained folates methylated at N-5 and folates formylated at N-10 in various states of oxidation and conjugation. The eluates also contained a compound believed to be 5-formyltetrahydropteroylglutamate, small amounts of pteroylglutamate, traces of tetrahydropteroylglutamate, and several unidentified folates.The increase of folate levels in rust-infected leaves was due almost entirely to increases of 5-methyl-tetrahydropteroylgiutamate and its conjugates. The folate composition of resistant-reacting leaves did not differ appreciably from that of susceptible-reacting leaves.Radioactivity was not incorporated into either 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate or into methionine when 5-[methyl- 14 C]-tetrahydropteroylglutamate was fed to wheat leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rust-infected leaves of both lines contained 50% more folates active for Lactobacillus casei than healthy leaves.

Material
susceptible linee0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
rust-infectede1
Interactor
Ruste1pathogen
Outcome
folatese1
Direction
moree1
Value
50%e1
Comparator
healthy leavese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six days after inoculation, crude extracts were prepared from healthy and rust-infected wheat leaves of a susceptible line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Extracts from rust-infected leaves of both lines contained 50% more folates, active as growth factors for Lactobacillus casei, than did those from healthy leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rust-infected and healthy wheat leaves did not differ in folates active for Streptococcus faecalis and Pediococcus cerevisiae.

Treatment
Rust-infectede2
Interactor
Ruste2pathogen
Outcome
content of folatese2
Direction
did not differe2
Comparator
healthy leavese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six days after inoculation, crude extracts were prepared from healthy and rust-infected wheat leaves of a susceptible line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rust-infected leaves did not differ from healthy leaves in their content of folates active as growth factors for Streptococcus faecalis and Pediococcus cerevisiae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–517 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase of folate levels in rust-infected wheat leaves was due almost entirely to increases of 5-methyl-tetrahydropteroylglutamate and its conjugates.

Treatment
rust-infectede3
Compound
5-methyl-tetrahydropteroylgiutamatee3
Outcome
folate levelse3
Direction
increasee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six days after inoculation, crude extracts were prepared from healthy and rust-infected wheat leaves of a susceptible line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“The increase of folate levels in rust-infected leaves was due almost entirely to increases of 5-methyl-tetrahydropteroylgiutamate and its conjugates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radioactivity from 5-[methyl- 14 C]-tetrahydropteroylglutamate was not incorporated into 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate or methionine in wheat leaves.

Treatment
5-[methyl- 14 C]-tetrahydropteroylglutamatee4
Outcome
Radioactivity was not incorporated into either 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate or into methioninee4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Radioactivity was not incorporated into either 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate or into methionine when 5-[methyl- 14 C]-tetrahydropteroylglutamate was fed to wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All wheat leaf extracts yielded similar folate profiles of five major and three minor peaks.

Outcome
folate profilese5
Qualifier
five major and three minor peakse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six days after inoculation, crude extracts were prepared from healthy and rust-infected wheat leaves of a susceptible line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e5

“All extracts yielded similar folate profiles consisting of five major and three minor peaks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–760 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The folate composition of resistant-reacting wheat leaves did not differ appreciably from that of susceptible-reacting leaves.

Material
resistant-reacting leavese6
Outcome
folate compositione6
Direction
did not differ appreciablye6
Comparator
susceptible-reacting leavese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six days after inoculation, crude extracts were prepared from healthy and rust-infected wheat leaves of a susceptible line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
e6

“The folate composition of resistant-reacting leaves did not differ appreciably from that of susceptible-reacting leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1479 · show in text ↑

methyl · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.