Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Evaluation of different weed management practices on nutrient uptake, yield and soil microbial population of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Rishav Raj; Ajay Kumar; Prithvi Raj

14
claims
35
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi, season of 2019-20 at the Research farm, Bihar Agricultural College, Sabour, Bhagalpur.The experiment consisting of fourteen treatments was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. The crop was infested with the divergent type of weed flora e.g. Phalaris minor, Fumaria parviflora and Cynodon dactylon of grassy, Chenopodium album, Anagallis arvensis, Melilotus alba, Argemona Mexicana and Solanum nigrum of broad-leaved and Cyperus rotundus, Cyprus iria and Cyprus difformis of sedges group.The sowing of wheat variety HD-2967 was done on 23th November 2019, and harvesting was done on 5th April, 2020. The results revealed that ready-mix application of (clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoE) and(mesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1PoE) gave higher weed control efficiency (82.02%, 79.31%), lower weed index (4.56%, 6.81%) respectively.Both of these treatments recorded 69.04 and 65.47 per cent grain yield enhancement along with the highest benefit-cost ratio (1.65 and 1.57).The maximum nutrient uptake was also noticed under T8 and T12. No any phytotoxic symptoms has been recorded under these two treatments.Among nutrient content (%), phosphorus content (%) in grain and straw has been recorded highest in weed free and it was significantly at par with T4, T5, T8 and T10 treatment respectively.Based on all the observation recorded, clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoE has performed better in all respects amongst all the herbicide applied treatment followed bymesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1 PoE.The maximum bacterial count (10.55 x 107 CFU g-1soil) was observed under the treatment T8 while fungi and actinomycetes population were found higher under weedy check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl plus metsulfuron-methyl produced 82.02% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoEe0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
82.02%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoE) and(mesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1PoE) gave higher weed control efficiency (82.02%, 79.31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron plus iodosulfuron produced 79.31% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
mesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1PoEe0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
79.31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoE) and(mesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1PoE) gave higher weed control efficiency (82.02%, 79.31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The clodinafop mixture produced a 4.56% weed index.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoEe1
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
4.56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower weed index (4.56%, 6.81%) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“ready-mix application of (clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mesosulfuron mixture produced a 6.81% weed index.

Treatment
mesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1PoEe1
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
6.81%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower weed index (4.56%, 6.81%) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“mesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1PoE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The clodinafop mixture increased grain yield by 69.04 percent.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoEe1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
69.04e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both of these treatments recorded 69.04 and 65.47 per cent grain yield enhancement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1067 · show in text ↑
e1

“ready-mix application of (clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mesosulfuron mixture increased grain yield by 65.47 percent.

Treatment
mesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1PoEe1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
65.47 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both of these treatments recorded 69.04 and 65.47 per cent grain yield enhancement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1067 · show in text ↑
e1

“mesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1PoE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The clodinafop mixture achieved a benefit-cost ratio of 1.65.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoEe1
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.65e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest benefit-cost ratio (1.65 and 1.57)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“ready-mix application of (clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mesosulfuron mixture achieved a benefit-cost ratio of 1.57.

Treatment
mesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1PoEe1
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.57e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest benefit-cost ratio (1.65 and 1.57)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“mesosulfuron @ 12 g a.i. ha-1 + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium @ 2.4 g a.i. ha-1PoE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake was maximal under T8 and T12.

Treatment
T8 and T12e0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum nutrient uptake was also noticed under T8 and T12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 and T12 showed no phytotoxic symptoms.

Treatment
T8 and T12e1
Outcome
No any phytotoxic symptomse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No any phytotoxic symptoms has been recorded under these two treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1260 · show in text ↑
e1

“under T8 and T12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had the highest phosphorus content in grain and straw, statistically at par with four treatments.

Treatment
weed freee0
Outcome
phosphorus content (%) in grain and strawe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
T4, T5, T8 and T10e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phosphorus content (%) in grain and straw has been recorded highest in weed free and it was significantly at par with T4, T5, T8 and T10 treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged the clodinafop mixture best among herbicide treatments.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoEe0
Outcome
has performed better in all respects amongst all the herbicide applied treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop-propargyl @ 60 g a.i. ha-1 + metsulfuron-methyl @ 4 g a.i. ha-1 PoE has performed better in all respects amongst all the herbicide applied treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 had the maximum bacterial count, 10.55 x 107 CFU per gram soil.

Treatment
T8e0
Outcome
bacterial counte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
10.55 x 107 CFU g-1soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum bacterial count (10.55 x 107 CFU g-1soil) was observed under the treatment T8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1829 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal and actinomycete populations were higher under the weedy check.

Treatment
weedy checke0
Outcome
fungi and actinomycetes populatione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungi and actinomycetes population were found higher under weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1906 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.