Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Weed Management and Fertility Levels Influence on Weed Growth and Performance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Anshul Gupta; S.S. Yadav; L.R. Yadav; et al.

13
claims
34
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter 2016-17 and 2017-18 at Agronomy research farm, Jobner, Rajasthan to evaluate the weed growth, nutrient removal, weed control efficiency, yield and nutrient uptake by wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend Fiori & Paol] as influenced by nitrogen levels (0, 45, 90 and 135 kg/ha) and weed control methods (weedy check, once HW at 25 DAS, two HW at 25 & 45 DAS, 2,4-D ester @ 0.5 kg/ha, metsulfuron methyl @ 4 g/ha, sulfosulfuron 75%+ metsulfuron methyl 5 WG @ 40 g/ha and mesosulfuron 3%+ iodosulfuron 0.6% @ 14.4 g/ha). Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS) had the significantly lowest weed biomass (151.5 kg/ha), weed control efficiency (90.03%), N, P and K depletion (2.91, 0.45 and 2.47 kg/ha), highest grain (4.65 t/ha), straw yield 5.72 t/ha and N, P and K uptake (113.7, 28.6 and 113.9 kg/ha) followed by mesosulfuron 3%+ iodosulfuron 0.6% @ 14.4 g/ha (PoE) (Pooled data two years). Nitrogen fertilization at 90 kg/ha significantly improved the weed biomass, weed control efficiency, nutrient depletion, grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptake by wheat crop over the preceding levels. However, it remained statistically at par with 135 kg N/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the significantly lowest weed biomass, 151.5 kg/ha.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
loweste1
Value
151.5 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly lowest weed biomass (151.5 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave a weed control efficiency of 90.03%.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Value
90.03%e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed control efficiency (90.03%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the lowest weed N depletion, 2.91 kg/ha.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
N, P and K depletione1
Direction
loweste1
Value
2.91e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly lowest weed biomass (151.5 kg/ha), weed control efficiency (90.03%), N, P and K depletion (2.91, 0.45 and 2.47 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the lowest weed P depletion, 0.45 kg/ha.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
N, P and K depletione1
Direction
loweste1
Value
0.45e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly lowest weed biomass (151.5 kg/ha), weed control efficiency (90.03%), N, P and K depletion (2.91, 0.45 and 2.47 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the lowest weed K depletion, 2.47 kg/ha.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
N, P and K depletione1
Direction
loweste1
Value
2.47 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly lowest weed biomass (151.5 kg/ha), weed control efficiency (90.03%), N, P and K depletion (2.91, 0.45 and 2.47 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the highest wheat grain yield, 4.65 t/ha.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Outcome
graine1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.65 t/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest grain (4.65 t/ha), straw yield 5.72 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave a wheat straw yield of 5.72 t/ha, the highest.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.72 t/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest grain (4.65 t/ha), straw yield 5.72 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the highest wheat N uptake, 113.7 kg/ha.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
113.7e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest grain (4.65 t/ha), straw yield 5.72 t/ha and N, P and K uptake (113.7, 28.6 and 113.9 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the highest wheat P uptake, 28.6 kg/ha.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
28.6e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest grain (4.65 t/ha), straw yield 5.72 t/ha and N, P and K uptake (113.7, 28.6 and 113.9 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the highest wheat K uptake, 113.9 kg/ha.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
113.9 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest grain (4.65 t/ha), straw yield 5.72 t/ha and N, P and K uptake (113.7, 28.6 and 113.9 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 90 kg/ha significantly improved weed biomass, weed control efficiency and nutrient depletion over the preceding N levels.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilization at 90 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass, weed control efficiency, nutrient depletione0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
preceding levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization at 90 kg/ha significantly improved the weed biomass, weed control efficiency, nutrient depletion, grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptake by wheat crop over the preceding levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 90 kg/ha significantly improved wheat grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptake over the preceding N levels.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilization at 90 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
preceding levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization at 90 kg/ha significantly improved the weed biomass, weed control efficiency, nutrient depletion, grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptake by wheat crop over the preceding levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 90 kg N/ha level remained statistically at par with 135 kg N/ha for the measured weed and wheat parameters.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilization at 90 kg/hae0
Outcome
weed biomass, weed control efficiency, nutrient depletion, grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
135 kg N/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization at 90 kg/ha significantly improved the weed biomass, weed control efficiency, nutrient depletion, grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptake by wheat crop over the preceding levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1141 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, it remained statistically at par with 135 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1201 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

85 papers: 49 positive, 36 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.