Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Post-emergence application of metribuzin was generally less effective on brome grass than incorporation by sowing.

A claim from Tolerance of wheat cultivars to metribuzin and implications for the control of Bromus diandrus and B. rigidus in Western Australia · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence application of metribuzin was generally less effective on brome grass than incorporation by sowing.

Treatment
Post-emergence application of metribuzine0
Interactor
brome grasse0weed
Outcome
effective on brome grasse0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
incorporation by sowinge0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Post-emergence application of metribuzin was generally less effective on brome grass and more phytotoxic to the crop than incorporation by sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–705

Title

Tolerance of wheat cultivars to metribuzin and implications for the control of Bromus diandrus and B. rigidus in Western Australia

GS Gill; DG Bowran Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1990. doi:10.1071/ea9900373

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-b63dc657ac55b69e2dceb5fdf8a8da65266bb7e09e18e9b1e780a03b142f0781 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

metribuzin · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.