Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to determine the influence of metribuzin [4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4 H )-one] and/or chlorsulfuron {2-chloro- N -[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl)benzenesulfonamide} on germination, coleoptile growth, and mineral accumulation of seed from treated parent plants. The herbicides were applied postemergence in the spring to ‘Vona’ and ‘Centurk’ winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). The rate of metribuzin was 360 g ai/ha, with chlorsulfuron applied at 18, 35, or 70 g/ha. Metribuzin reduced grain yields of both varieties approximately 40%, whereas chlorsulfuron at the higher rates reduced grain yields of only Vona. Seed germination was not affected by either herbicide, but metribuzin, when applied alone, reduced coleoptile growth of Vona seed. The addition of chlorsulfuron to metribuzin eliminated this growth reduction. The mineral concentration of the seed of both varieties indicated that metribuzin and chlorsulfuron did not affect mineral translocation to the seed by the parent plant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Metribuzin reduced grain yields of both varieties by approximately 40%
- Taxon
- Winter Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Metribuzine0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- approximately 40%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e0“Metribuzin reduced grain yields of both varieties approximately 40%”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorsulfuron at the higher rates reduced grain yields of Vona only
- Taxon
- Winter Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Vonae1
- Treatment
- chlorsulfuron at the higher ratese1
- Outcome
- grain yieldse1
- Direction
- reducede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e1“chlorsulfuron at the higher rates reduced grain yields of only Vona”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed germination was not affected by either herbicide
- Taxon
- Winter Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- either herbicidee2
- Outcome
- Seed germinatione2
- Direction
- not affectede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e2“Seed germination was not affected by either herbicide”
Claim · model-written summary
Metribuzin applied alone reduced coleoptile growth of Vona seed
- Taxon
- Winter Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Vonae3
- Organ / stage
- seede3
- Treatment
- metribuzine3
- Outcome
- coleoptile growthe3
- Direction
- reducede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e3“metribuzin, when applied alone, reduced coleoptile growth of Vona seed”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding chlorsulfuron to metribuzin eliminated the coleoptile growth reduction
- Taxon
- Winter Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- addition of chlorsulfuron to metribuzine4
- Outcome
- growth reductione4
- Direction
- eliminatede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e4“The addition of chlorsulfuron to metribuzin eliminated this growth reduction”
Claim · model-written summary
Metribuzin and chlorsulfuron did not affect mineral translocation to the seed
- Taxon
- Winter Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- metribuzin and chlorsulfurone5
- Outcome
- mineral translocation to the seede5
- Direction
- did not affecte5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e5“metribuzin and chlorsulfuron did not affect mineral translocation to the seed”
The same questions in other papers
chlorsulfuron · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →chlorsulfuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
71 papers more in this group
See all 75 papers →metribuzin · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
metribuzin · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →chlorsulfuron · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →herbicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.