Paper · 2015 · Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciences

Effects of Weed Control Treatments on Wheat Crop and Associated Weeds

A. H. Nanher; Raghuvir Singh; Shashidharyadav; et al.

10
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in wheat during rabi season 2011–12 on sandy loam soil at Crop Research Centre, Chirodi of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut (U.P.). The experiment was conducted in R. B.D with three replications comprising ten treatments of weed management, clodinafop 60 g a.i ha−1, sulfosulfuron 25 g a.i ha−1, metribuzin at 105 g a.i ha−1, carfentrazone 40 g ai ha−1, clodi.+ metri 60 +122.5 g a.i ha−1, clodi.+ metri 60 +105 g a.i ha−1, sulfo.+ metri 25 +105 g a.i ha−1, sulfo.+ carfen. 25 + 40 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence and weed free and weedy. The results indicated that plant population, plants height, maximum number of tillers/meter row length, dry matter accumulation, highest grain yield (55.13 q/ha−1).straw yield(78.08 q/ha−1) significantly reduced the weed population, dry weight of weed, highest weed control efficiency and minimum loss of nutrient were recorded with the application of sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence established its superiority over rest of the herbicides. Similarly application of sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 +105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence resulted into higher gross return (90362.05), net return (63453.59 ha−1) and B: C ratio (2.48).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron + metribuzin reduced weed population and weed dry weight in wheat more than the other herbicides.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergencee3
Interactor
weedst1weed
Outcome
weed population, dry weight of weede0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
rest of the herbicidese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“Associated Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly reduced the weed population, dry weight of weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–859 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded with the application of sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence established its superiority over rest of the herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron + metribuzin gave the highest weed control efficiency in wheat.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergencee3
Interactor
weedst1weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
rest of the herbicidese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“Associated Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–892 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded with the application of sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence established its superiority over rest of the herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron + metribuzin gave the minimum loss of nutrient in wheat.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergencee3
Outcome
loss of nutriente2
Direction
minimume2
Comparator
rest of the herbicidese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–48 · show in text ↑
e2

“minimum loss of nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–921 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded with the application of sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence established its superiority over rest of the herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron + metribuzin gave the highest grain yield of wheat, 55.13 q/ha.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergencee3
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
55.13 q/ha−1e4
Comparator
rest of the herbicidese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–48 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded with the application of sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence established its superiority over rest of the herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1080 · show in text ↑
e4

“highest grain yield (55.13 q/ha−1).straw yield(78.08 q/ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron + metribuzin gave the highest straw yield of wheat, 78.08 q/ha.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergencee3
Outcome
straw yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
78.08 q/ha−1e4
Comparator
rest of the herbicidese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–48 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded with the application of sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 + 105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence established its superiority over rest of the herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1080 · show in text ↑
e4

“highest grain yield (55.13 q/ha−1).straw yield(78.08 q/ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–797 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant population, plant height and number of tillers were maximum in the weed-control trial.

Outcome
plant population, plants height, maximum number of tillers/meter row lengthe5
Direction
maximume5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–48 · show in text ↑
e5

“plant population, plants height, maximum number of tillers/meter row length, dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–735 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accumulation was recorded in the weed-control trial of wheat.

Outcome
dry matter accumulatione5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–48 · show in text ↑
e5

“plant population, plants height, maximum number of tillers/meter row length, dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron + metribuzin gave a higher gross return in wheat, 90362.05.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 +105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergencee6
Outcome
gross returne6
Direction
highere6
Value
90362.05e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–48 · show in text ↑
e6

“application of sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 +105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence resulted into higher gross return (90362.05), net return (63453.59 ha−1) and B: C ratio (2.48)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron + metribuzin gave a higher net return in wheat, 63453.59 ha−1.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 +105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergencee6
Outcome
net returne6
Direction
highere6
Value
63453.59 ha−1e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–48 · show in text ↑
e6

“application of sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 +105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence resulted into higher gross return (90362.05), net return (63453.59 ha−1) and B: C ratio (2.48)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron + metribuzin gave a higher B:C ratio of 2.48 in wheat.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 +105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergencee6
Outcome
B: C ratioe6
Direction
highere6
Value
2.48e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–48 · show in text ↑
e6

“application of sulfosulfuron.+ metribuzin 25 +105 g a.i ha−1 as post emergence resulted into higher gross return (90362.05), net return (63453.59 ha−1) and B: C ratio (2.48)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1265 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

metribuzin · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.