Intervention effectmodel-written summary

chlorsulfuron plus metsulfuron at 26 g/ha reduced wheat forage production.

A claim from Sulfonylurea Herbicides Affect Hard Red Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Forage and Grain Yield · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorsulfuron plus metsulfuron at 26 g/ha reduced wheat forage production.

Treatment
chlorsulfuron plus metsulfuron at 26 g/hae0
Outcome
total forage productione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
weed-free wheate0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triasulfuron at 30 g/ha or chlorsulfuron plus metsulfuron at 26 g/ha applied PRE and metribuzin applied early POST alone at 280 g/ha or tank-mixed with triasulfuron at 158 + 30 g/ha or chlorsulfuron plus metsulfuron at 210 + 21 g/ha, all decreased total forage production of weed-free wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–476

Title

Sulfonylurea Herbicides Affect Hard Red Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Forage and Grain Yield

Jeffrey A. Koscelny; Thomas F. Peeper; Eugene G. Krenzer Weed Technology 1996. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00040392

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-5f8f4d8fbb1e668b173bcc475f4dff144ca5c19a1c7805bd73344272b259445b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

chlorsulfuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 12 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 143 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

146 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.