Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the highest wheat N uptake, 113.7 kg/ha.

A claim from Weed Management and Fertility Levels Influence on Weed Growth and Performance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the highest wheat N uptake, 113.7 kg/ha.

Treatment
Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)e0
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
113.7e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109
e0

“Two hand weeding (HW) at 25 and 45 (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–603
e1

“highest grain (4.65 t/ha), straw yield 5.72 t/ha and N, P and K uptake (113.7, 28.6 and 113.9 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–845

Title

Weed Management and Fertility Levels Influence on Weed Growth and Performance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Anshul Gupta; S.S. Yadav; L.R. Yadav; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.239

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-2da65a8cf91aaaa8c7c3de1a7c42b3d27f2d6519981755f277782050b63d0917 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

herbicide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.